Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Worked example: Move discussion of contracting process out of unsuccessful tenders #1159

Closed
jpmckinney opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Worked example: Move discussion of contracting process out of unsuccessful tenders #1159

jpmckinney opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
Focus - Documentation Includes corrections, clarifications, new guidance, and UI/UX issues
Milestone
Examples

Comments

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

jpmckinney commented Jan 6, 2021 •
edited
Loading

The worked example was merged in #1007 based on this outline.

However, it spends the first half explaining what a contracting process is.

This content should be moved/removed, since #866 will define a contracting process.
@jpmckinney jpmckinney added the Focus - Documentation Includes corrections, clarifications, new guidance, and UI/UX issues label Jan 6, 2021
@jpmckinney jpmckinney added this to the Worked examples milestone Jan 6, 2021
@jpmckinney jpmckinney mentioned this issue Jan 6, 2021
Closed
@JachymHercher JachymHercher mentioned this issue Jul 28, 2021
Merged
@JachymHercher
Copy link
Contributor

This issue should be resolved by #1216, which splits the unsuccessful tenders into map/contracting_planning_processes and map/unsuccessful_processes.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member Author

Agreed. Okay to close after #1216.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Focus - Documentation Includes corrections, clarifications, new guidance, and UI/UX issues
Projects
Iterative improvements
Status: Done
Milestone
Examples
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jpmckinney @JachymHercher