Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing field: procurementMethodDetails #221

Closed
timgdavies opened this issue Jul 29, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Missing field: procurementMethodDetails #221

timgdavies opened this issue Jul 29, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor

timgdavies commented Jul 29, 2015

From open-contracting-archive/implementation-and-extensions#2

At the moment procurementMethod is a closed codelist, with values for open, selective and limited.

Any implementation should attempt to map the classifications of contract awards to this codelist - as knowing when things are open, selective or limited is important to many users.

However, many countries have much more detailed lists of procurement types, usually country-specific.

Adding a new procurementMethodDetails would seem like a natural property for us to add, to parallel awardMethodDetails for this information.

@timgdavies timgdavies added this to the Version 1.1 milestone Oct 5, 2015
@timgdavies timgdavies self-assigned this May 19, 2016
@timgdavies timgdavies modified the milestones: 1.0.2 and Documentation updates, Version 1.1 Aug 15, 2016
@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor Author

procurementMethodDetail already exists in the 1.0 docs. It appears it was a schema error that it's not in the schema.

@agm3dc
Copy link

agm3dc commented Aug 16, 2016

@timgdavies do you mean procurementMethodRationale? We are not aware of procurementMethodDetail in the 1.0 docs, but we agree with the rationale and support its creation. We often run into cases where the procurementMethod's closed codelist lacks sufficient specificity for our government cases.

@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry - I used the wrong docs link. At the bottom of this page you find procurementMethodDetails mentioned, and disambiguated from procurementMethodRationale.

@timgdavies timgdavies removed the bug label Sep 18, 2016
@timgdavies timgdavies changed the title Proposed field: procurementMethodDetails Missing field: procurementMethodDetails Oct 26, 2016
@Bjwebb Bjwebb mentioned this issue Nov 11, 2016
6 tasks
@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed in 1.0.2 release which is now live.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants