Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitOps-ML Subgroup #127

Open
williamcaban opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

GitOps-ML Subgroup #127

williamcaban opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@williamcaban
Copy link

williamcaban commented Oct 5, 2022

Starting a subgroup @open-gitops/gitops-ml to discuss GitOps patterns with AI & ML. Considering first meeting for after KubeCon NA 2022.

If you want to participate in this discussion, please, comment bellow.

Trying to accommodate multiple timezones, proposing to start in one of these two:

  • Nov 1st @ 6pm CET/12pm ET/9am PT
  • Nov 3rd @ 5:30pm CET/11:30am ET/9:30am PT << This has been selected as the day + time slot for the initial meeting

We can start collecting topics here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HHkqMK_GW6dYHPu1oDjRXesPFO0u1KtyHX70FQ95_7A/edit?usp=sharing

@williamcaban williamcaban changed the title GitOps-ML SubGroup GitOps-ML Subgroup Oct 6, 2022
@niklasmtj
Copy link
Member

Thanks William for organising ☺️
Nov 3rd sounds good. The first is a local holiday here in Germany, so I guess I'm out for this day then. But feel blocked when the 1st is better for more people. Since I don't have much knowledge in this space I would have been the fly on the wall in this meeting anyway.

@samueltauil
Copy link
Contributor

hey William, thanks for starting this group, both dates work for me but if 3rd works for Niklas, I guess that's a second vote then :)

@williamcaban
Copy link
Author

In two attempts there has been a lack of quorum so proceeding to cancel the series. We can revisit this next year if there is interest from the community.

@scottrigby
Copy link
Member

Let's pick back up on this

I'm thinking attendance at live meetings may not be absolutely necessary if there is enough regular async participation.

ONE YEAR LATER

Questions:

  1. 📊 What would constitute "enough"?

    Are 3 or 4 people who contribute regularly, through GitHub discussion comments, and potentially writing/comments in collab docs (Google docs, etc) on this topic?

  2. 📊 Who is willing and able to contribute to creating content around this asynchronously?

    I would think with the recent explosion in interest around all things AI/ML/LLM, this topic might pick back up again at the end of 2023 into 2024.

@scottrigby scottrigby reopened this Dec 5, 2023
@samueltauil
Copy link
Contributor

I can help for sure, maybe we could discuss this tomorrow in the call as well, I do have some organization questions

scottrigby pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
* Fix syleguide

Signed-off-by: iboonox <iheb.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Rigby <scott@r6by.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants