Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move top level power to maintainers #123

Conversation

scottrigby
Copy link
Member

Discussed at multiple meetings.

While I updated the final wording, @todaywasawesome discussed at length and agreed on the important details. Added Dan to Co-authored-by commit trailer for this reason.

Since this is a major governance change, I assigned all current maintainers (including maintainers who are chairs) as reviewers on this PR.

…intainers

Co-authored-by: Dan Garfield <dan@codefresh.io>

Signed-off-by: Scott Rigby <scott@r6by.com>
Also define simple and supermajority voting (more than half and 2/3 of active
maintainers), to clarify this clause.

Co-authored-by: Dan Garfield <dan@codefresh.io>

Signed-off-by: Scott Rigby <scott@r6by.com>
…ive staus

Co-authored-by: Dan Garfield <dan@codefresh.io>

Signed-off-by: Scott Rigby <scott@r6by.com>
- Remove wikipedia links since we've now defined Simple and Supermajority
- Link to Maintainers section

Signed-off-by: Scott Rigby <scott@r6by.com>
Copy link

@williamcaban williamcaban left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM

Copy link
Member

@todaywasawesome todaywasawesome left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfectly done. Great job @scottrigby !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants