Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0.2.0.0] l10n_id_ppajp_kap #113

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 23, 2018
Merged

[8.0.2.0.0] l10n_id_ppajp_kap #113

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 23, 2018

Conversation

andhit-r
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

* Add dependency to date_range_calendar_data
* Add common wizard to print
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 23, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #113 into 8.0 will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 52%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              8.0     #113      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.36%   57.31%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          90       91       +1     
  Lines        2498     2523      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits         1433     1446      +13     
- Misses       1065     1077      +12
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
l10n_id_ppajp_kap/wizards/common_report_wizard.py 52% <52%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ddfb52e...2efd6ea. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 23, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 57.313% when pulling 2efd6ea on 8.0.2.0.0-l10n_id_ppajp_kap into ddfb52e on 8.0.

@andhit-r andhit-r merged commit 3a92233 into 8.0 Sep 23, 2018
@andhit-r andhit-r deleted the 8.0.2.0.0-l10n_id_ppajp_kap branch December 29, 2018 00:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants