Proposal for SIG CICD observability

[adrielp]

No description provided.

[svrnm]

Some remarks, some questions. To get rid of the spell checking issues add the words to .cspell.yaml

[ericchapman80]

See inline suggestions.

[carlosalberto]

Hey all,

We at the TC briefly discussed this yesterday, and we decided to go ahead with this SIG, and I will be your initial contact point.

As the vast majority of the changes will be semantic convention additions (no major Specification changes are expected at this time), we'd like to have the group attend the Semantic Convention SIG calls on Mondays, in order to present and discuss any initial topic. This will be a good opportunity for others to get a general idea of this initiative, and also good for the new group to get used to the OTel community.

A little while after, as the effort picks up, we can start having separate calls 100% dedicated to CI/CD.

Let me know if that works for you (Monday call times, etc).

[ericchapman80]

Hey all,

We at the TC briefly discussed this yesterday, and we decided to go ahead with this SIG, and I will be your initial contact point.

As the vast majority of the changes will be semantic convention additions (no major Specification changes are expected at this time), we'd like to have the group attend the Semantic Convention SIG calls on Mondays, in order to present and discuss any initial topic. This will be a good opportunity for others to get a general idea of this initiative, and also good for the new group to get used to the OTel community.

A little while after, as the effort picks up, we can start having separate calls 100% dedicated to CI/CD.

Let me know if that works for you (Monday call times, etc).

That's awesome @carlosalberto! Excited to get rolling!

[adrielp]

Hey all,

We at the TC briefly discussed this yesterday, and we decided to go ahead with this SIG, and I will be your initial contact point.

As the vast majority of the changes will be semantic convention additions (no major Specification changes are expected at this time), we'd like to have the group attend the Semantic Convention SIG calls on Mondays, in order to present and discuss any initial topic. This will be a good opportunity for others to get a general idea of this initiative, and also good for the new group to get used to the OTel community.

A little while after, as the effort picks up, we can start having separate calls 100% dedicated to CI/CD.

Let me know if that works for you (Monday call times, etc).

This is awesome @carlosalberto! Thanks for this update!

Overall, I think the Monday will be fine to start. There's a lot of folks that have been added to be part of the SIG so I think we're likely to have the coverage to join the Monday meetings for a bit until the effort picks up enough to get a dedicated call.

We have a slack channel in the CNCF Slack where we have been communicating so in my mind, the next steps for us is to go to that meeting and present some initial topics we formulate there, which I'm sure will heavily be focused on the OTEP.

Is there anything I need to do to this PR as it stands now to get it approved & merged in?

[carlosalberto]

@svrnm Is the lint step good for you?

[svrnm]

@svrnm Is the lint step good for you?

yes! Apologies for keeping this blocked with my old review

[oleg-nenashev]

The proposal looks good! I definitely confirm my participation while wearing the @jenkinsci hat, and most likely @gradle too

[carlosalberto]

@jsuereth Looks good?

cc @trask

[jsuereth]

Given this group will share time w/ the Semantic Convention WG meeting, you can add me, as well, for the TC sponsor.

[trask]

Welcome CI/CD semconv working group!!!