-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
receiver_creator: don't embed endpoint field in unsupported configs #18641
receiver_creator: don't embed endpoint field in unsupported configs #18641
Conversation
Foresight Summary
View More Details✅ telemetrygen workflow has finished in 1 minute 8 seconds (1 minute 57 seconds less than
|
Job | Failed Steps | Tests | |
---|---|---|---|
build-dev | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
publish-latest | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
publish-stable | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
✅ check-links workflow has finished in 1 minute 28 seconds (1 minute 5 seconds less than main
branch avg.) and finished at 15th Feb, 2023.
Job | Failed Steps | Tests | |
---|---|---|---|
changed files | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
check-links | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
✅ build-and-test workflow has finished in 42 minutes 23 seconds (23 minutes 9 seconds less than main
branch avg.) and finished at 15th Feb, 2023.
Job | Failed Steps | Tests | |
---|---|---|---|
unittest-matrix (1.19, internal) | - 🔗 | ✅ 561 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.20, internal) | - 🔗 | ✅ 561 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.19, processor) | - 🔗 | ✅ 1528 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.20, processor) | - 🔗 | ✅ 1528 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.19, extension) | - 🔗 | ✅ 537 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
correctness-metrics | - 🔗 | ✅ 2 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
correctness-traces | - 🔗 | ✅ 17 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.19, receiver-0) | - 🔗 | ✅ 2574 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.20, receiver-0) | - 🔗 | ✅ 2574 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.20, exporter) | - 🔗 | ✅ 2455 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.19, exporter) | - 🔗 | ✅ 2455 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.20, receiver-1) | - 🔗 | ✅ 1933 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.20, extension) | - 🔗 | ✅ 537 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.20, other) | - 🔗 | ✅ 4687 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.19, receiver-1) | - 🔗 | ✅ 1933 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
unittest-matrix (1.19, other) | - 🔗 | ✅ 4687 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
integration-tests | - 🔗 | ✅ 55 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
setup-environment | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
lint-matrix (receiver-1) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
lint-matrix (processor) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
lint-matrix (receiver-0) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
lint-matrix (extension) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
lint-matrix (exporter) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
checks | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
build-examples | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
lint-matrix (internal) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
check-collector-module-version | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
lint-matrix (other) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
check-codeowners | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
lint | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
unittest (1.20) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
unittest (1.19) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (darwin, amd64) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (darwin, arm64) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (linux, 386) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (linux, amd64) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (linux, arm) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (linux, arm64) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (linux, ppc64le) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (windows, 386) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
cross-compile (windows, amd64) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
build-package (deb) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
build-package (rpm) | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
windows-msi | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
publish-check | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
publish-dev | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
publish-stable | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
✅ load-tests workflow has finished in 7 minutes 53 seconds (9 minutes 4 seconds less than main
branch avg.) and finished at 15th Feb, 2023.
Job | Failed Steps | Tests | |
---|---|---|---|
loadtest (TestIdleMode) | - 🔗 | ✅ 1 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
loadtest (TestTraceAttributesProcessor) | - 🔗 | ✅ 3 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
loadtest (TestMetric10kDPS|TestMetricsFromFile) | - 🔗 | ✅ 6 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
loadtest (TestTraceNoBackend10kSPS|TestTrace1kSPSWithAttrs) | - 🔗 | ✅ 8 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
loadtest (TestMetricResourceProcessor|TestTrace10kSPS) | - 🔗 | ✅ 12 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
loadtest (TestTraceBallast1kSPSWithAttrs|TestTraceBallast1kSPSAddAttrs) | - 🔗 | ✅ 10 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
loadtest (TestBallastMemory|TestLog10kDPS) | - 🔗 | ✅ 18 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
setup-environment | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
✅ prometheus-compliance-tests workflow has finished in 12 minutes 37 seconds (⚠️ 3 minutes 43 seconds more than main
branch avg.) and finished at 15th Feb, 2023.
Job | Failed Steps | Tests | |
---|---|---|---|
prometheus-compliance-tests | - 🔗 | ✅ 21 ❌ 0 ⏭ 0 🔗 | See Details |
✅ e2e-tests workflow has finished in 12 minutes 50 seconds (3 minutes 35 seconds less than main
branch avg.) and finished at 15th Feb, 2023.
Job | Failed Steps | Tests | |
---|---|---|---|
kubernetes-test | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
⭕ build-and-test-windows workflow has finished in 9 seconds (41 minutes 10 seconds less than main
branch avg.) and finished at 25th Feb, 2023.
Job | Failed Steps | Tests | |
---|---|---|---|
windows-unittest-matrix | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
windows-unittest | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
✅ changelog workflow has finished in 2 minutes 15 seconds and finished at 25th Feb, 2023.
Job | Failed Steps | Tests | |
---|---|---|---|
changelog | - 🔗 | N/A | See Details |
*You can configure Foresight comments in your organization settings page.
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ func (mh *mockHostFactories) GetExtensions() map[component.ID]component.Componen | |||
return mh.extensions | |||
} | |||
|
|||
var portRule = func(s string) rule { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The linter required this change since newRuleOrPanic()
was always used with the same argument.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
2253ec1
to
62cb98d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Howdy!
These changes can be improved as highlighted by my comments but I sense there is some urgency on getting these out so I'm fine if you wish to follow up in a future PR.
require.Error(t, mr.lastError) | ||
require.EqualError(t, mr.lastError, test.expectedError) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line 101 isn't needed since it is tested with 102.
assert.Equal(t, 0, handler.receiversByEndpointID.Size()) | ||
require.Error(t, mr.lastError) | ||
require.EqualError(t, mr.lastError, test.expectedError) | ||
require.Nil(t, mr.startedComponent) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would leave this as assert
instead of require
since there is no risk of panicing and it is nice to know all errors within one test.
require.NotNil(t, v) | ||
actualConfig = v.cfg | ||
default: | ||
t.Fatalf("unexpected startedComponent: %T", v) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe there is require.Fail(...)
that you can use here instead of calling t
directly, helps keep the test output consistent.
@@ -69,3 +71,59 @@ func Test_loadAndCreateRuntimeReceiver(t *testing.T) { | |||
}()) | |||
}) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func TestValidateSetEndpointFromConfig(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would consider breaking this test up into a test table so that you can use assert
instead of require
to help surface errors within the same test run instead of requiring incremental changes that could conflict with each other.
Description:
Fixing a bug - These changes add embedded config
endpoint
field validation to the receiver creator so that it doesn't try to set the field for a config that doesn't support it. Also including a small refactor of the expansion logic to support more formats like those of the prometheus receiver.Link to tracking Issue:
#7381
Testing:
Updates existing observer handler tests to be more exhaustive than mock method call validation checks and adds more coverage for expansion suite.
Documentation:
Updated readme to describe the updated behavior.