Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update carbon and wavefront to the new interface #744

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2020

Conversation

bogdandrutu
Copy link
Member

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu commented Aug 17, 2020

No description provided.

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu requested a review from a team August 17, 2020 22:04
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu force-pushed the carbonwave branch 2 times, most recently from dcc7254 to a0347c1 Compare August 18, 2020 01:30
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 18, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #744 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 64.70%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #744      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.20%   87.22%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         210      210              
  Lines       11387    11387              
==========================================
+ Hits         9930     9932       +2     
+ Misses       1116     1114       -2     
  Partials      341      341              
Flag Coverage Δ
#integration 72.09% <ø> (ø)
#unit 87.02% <64.70%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
receiver/carbonreceiver/receiver.go 95.91% <ø> (ø)
receiver/carbonreceiver/factory.go 70.73% <52.00%> (+5.73%) ⬆️
receiver/carbonreceiver/transport/tcp_server.go 65.71% <100.00%> (ø)
receiver/carbonreceiver/transport/udp_server.go 82.75% <100.00%> (ø)
receiver/wavefrontreceiver/factory.go 100.00% <100.00%> (+6.25%) ⬆️
...eiver/awsxrayreceiver/internal/udppoller/poller.go 97.56% <0.00%> (-2.44%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0ad332d...349f3c1. Read the comment docs.

Signed-off-by: Bogdan Drutu <bogdandrutu@gmail.com>
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu merged commit 660bbfb into open-telemetry:master Aug 18, 2020
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu deleted the carbonwave branch August 18, 2020 15:18
dyladan referenced this pull request in dynatrace-oss-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib Jan 29, 2021
This makes testing the collector locally harder. Also the condition is not enforced because having a disabled processor in the pipeline passes that condition which makes it not very useful.
codeboten pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2022
Fixes #744

This is a temporary hotfix for the issue linked above. We'll need to
figure out a proper fix later.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants