Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: compare DataType only by typeId #217

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lukasberbuer
Copy link
Member

@lukasberbuer lukasberbuer commented Mar 7, 2024

Deep comparison of all UA_DataType fields should not be required. Just compare the typeId instead.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.57143% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.56%. Comparing base (e6d7aa3) to head (6b9a430).

Files Patch % Lines
include/open62541pp/DataType.h 62.50% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #217      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.08%   94.56%   +0.48%     
==========================================
  Files         104      105       +1     
  Lines        5443     5411      -32     
  Branches      722      723       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         5121     5117       -4     
+ Misses        190      174      -16     
+ Partials      132      120      -12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lukasberbuer lukasberbuer merged commit 1517ef7 into master Mar 8, 2024
72 of 73 checks passed
@lukasberbuer lukasberbuer deleted the fix/datatype-comparison branch March 8, 2024 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant