Add support for skiping generation

[sunnymoon]

No description provided.

[langecode]

Thanks for contributing. I will take a look at it asap.

[sunnymoon]

Thanks... If you need any further help please say so.

…

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 7:07 PM Thor Anker Kvisgård Lange < ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks for contributing. I will take a look at it asap. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#20 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEJ6KG3m3COt8RNvKGlKACuEplaXh7rYks5vPu5cgaJpZM4bGjPO> .

--

-- *Jose Pedro Pereira* CTO *»* Email/Gtalk: jpereira@linkare.com M: +351 210 181 241 <+351%20210%20181%20241> M: +351 918 140 992 <+351%20918%20140%20992> Portugal *»* T: +351 213 590 623 <+351%20213%20590%20623> A: Av. 5 de Outubro 77, 1º Esq., 1050-049 Lisboa <http://www.linkare.pt/pt/contactos.html> W: www.linkare.pt Belgium *»* T: +32 280 842 60 <+32%20280%20842%2060> A: 4 Rue de Pères Blancs, 1040 Etterbeek, Brussels <http://www.linkare.be/en/contact.html> W: www.linkare.be [image: banner] <http://linkare.com/signature_banner_link>

[sunnymoon]

Your code currently does not check for "package." but rather "package" with a startsWith, so if I have two packages like
a.b.cde.SomeWS
and
a.b.cdefgh.SomeWS

you'll match both classes if I specify a.b.cde as package and recurse flag is specified. That's why my code had a startsWith(package+".") in the check...

Hope you fix it...