Fix for when topology has visual runAfters in use

[andrewballantyne]

Closes: #1233

Description

Uses the runAfter state if any of the nodes have it -- to prevent mixing and matching and potentially causing duplicate lines.

From:

To:

How Has This Been Tested?

Using a Pipeline that has runAfter usage to view the Pipeline. Let me know if you need to see my example, it's taken from another source and I'm not sure how public that is.

Test Impact

None -- no tests.

Request review criteria:

• The commits have meaningful messages (squashes happen on merge by the bot).
• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit tests & storybook for related changes)

[lucferbux]

/lgtm

[lucferbux]

@andrewballantyne I've tried to set up a pipeline like this to test it, and I couldn't manage it, I've reviewed the code but didn't fully test the functionality, can you share me an example on how to deploy this kind of pipelines?

[Gkrumbach07]

/lgtm

got it working in the UI and it works as expected

[Gkrumbach07]

This is a smallish feature/bug fix with 2 LGTM tags.

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: Gkrumbach07, lucferbux

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[lucferbux]

[Updated] I've managed to test it, works fine. cc @andrewballantyne