Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #193 #194

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2021
Merged

Fix #193 #194

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2021

Conversation

gnn
Copy link
Collaborator

@gnn gnn commented Mar 31, 2021

Not much to it. Figured out the reason for the bug and hopefully fixed it. Could you check whether #193 is actually gone on this branch, @ulfmueller?

Since `uri` is only a constructor parameter and not actually an
attribute of `Connection` objects, setting it doesn't seem to do
anything, which might be the reason for `PostgresOperator`s not picking
up connection parameters, leading to #193.
Note that `Connection`s don't have an attribute for the database name,
but from testing it out, it seems that the database name is stored in
the `schema` attribute.
@gnn gnn requested a review from ulfmueller March 31, 2021 19:50
@gnn gnn self-assigned this Mar 31, 2021
@gnn gnn changed the title Fix #183 Fix #193 Mar 31, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ulfmueller ulfmueller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

works for me!

@gnn gnn merged commit de2f63d into dev Apr 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants