Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add logos for users of OpenFaaS #58

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2018
Merged

Conversation

kenfdev
Copy link
Member

@kenfdev kenfdev commented Aug 22, 2018

This adds logos to the list of users of OpenFaaS.
The issue is mentioned here.

It is hard to align all of them cleanly while the logos all have their own width, height, padding and stuff. This should be a good start though.

Tested the view with:

  • Chrome
  • Safari
  • Firefox

Signed-off-by: Ken Fukuyama kenfdev@gmail.com

This adds logos to the list of users of OpenFaaS.
The issue is mentioned
[here](openfaas/faas#776)

Signed-off-by: Ken Fukuyama <kenfdev@gmail.com>
@kenfdev
Copy link
Member Author

kenfdev commented Aug 22, 2018

3 columns
image

2 columns
image 1

1 column
image 2

@kenfdev
Copy link
Member Author

kenfdev commented Aug 22, 2018

I've coded all these logos with html tags. It'd be better if we could use Liquid syntax to auto generate them from the yaml. This didn't work out of the box (tried adding it to mkdocs.yml and wrote a for loop but the code just got rendered as is).
@johnmccabe, could you point me to the right way if you have any tips? thanks.

For the first release, this should be okay for now.

Copy link
Member

@alexellis alexellis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

VMware looks a bit odd now in a list with itself, but OK to merge.

@alexellis alexellis merged commit 0dc49bb into openfaas:master Aug 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants