Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump Code Climate's Rubocop version to their latest #4722

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020
Merged

Bump Code Climate's Rubocop version to their latest #4722

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020

Conversation

mkllnk
Copy link
Member

@mkllnk mkllnk commented Jan 28, 2020

What? Why?

I noticed that Code Climate is using an older version of Rubocop. That explains why we see different results locally. In this PR I chose the most recent version supported by Code Climate which is closer to our used version.

Code Climate seems to be a bit behind which clashes with our Dependabot updates. Maybe we should not follow Dependabot here and always update rubocop manually. It needs manual intervention anyway. Let's see.

What should we test?

No test needed.

Release notes

Fine-tuned the configuration of our automated code quality control.

Changelog Category: Changed

Our used version is still higher than that.
@mkllnk mkllnk self-assigned this Jan 28, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@luisramos0 luisramos0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@sauloperez
Copy link
Contributor

I think those CodeClimate issues deserve a look we could fix some and some others to the todo.

@sauloperez
Copy link
Contributor

I went ahead and approved it in Code Climate. This is already good as it is and we can fix those issues later.

@sauloperez sauloperez merged commit c9abdac into openfoodfoundation:master Feb 6, 2020
@mkllnk mkllnk deleted the code-climate-rubocop branch March 4, 2020 00:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants