-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ofSystem with Poco::Process. #2162
Comments
I'm not exactly sure what this is about - @kylemcdonald @arturoc @ofTheo could you take a look? |
the PR #2164 attached to this looks good to me. |
@ofTheo the PR should already be up to date with develop, don't let yourself be mislead by the merge status warning - that Travis message is from the CI/unit tests that @diasbruno is running with his copy of OF. |
only thing i would change is the second parameter to be something that it's not Poco dependent, can we pass an array of strings or something similar? we can even inherit or typedef from the poco class |
yep @arturoc. i forgot to change it. typedef Poco::Process::Args ofSystemArgs. (std::vector). |
yes, if you can change that i think it's good to merge |
the PR has the type definition. i forget to change code in the description. :) |
Hi all, I'm not sure what happened here -- it seems the PR was closed? We need this to be fixed for ofSketch because I'm happy to pull apart the old PR and resubmit it -- unless @diasbruno has a clean PR to submit. |
Closing this, as Poco is no longer part of the core. If there is a discussion of a non-Poco way to implement it, then let's reopen because the need is probably still there. |
i'm writing an app with a node.js backend, so i'm using a lot ofSystem. the current implementation seems to be inconsistent. with Poco::Process, it works fine.
the new ofSystem would be something like this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: