Document relationship between GeoSPARQL and SFA-CA #300
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Change SF vocabulary topic
Change SF vocabulary topic
remove reference to ISO 19117
remove reference to ISO 19107
This reverts commit 474ad8d.
Replace SFA-CA reference with OGC document and URL
Add a paragraph on SFA-CA (not finished yet)
Complete extra paragraph
situx
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2022
|
Approving and merging but a follow-up PR will need to replace all [[ISO19125-1]] refs with [[OGCSFACA]] |
nicholascar
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a paragraph to section 8 (Geometry Extension) to explain how GeoSPARQL is based on SFA-CA.
Fixes #269, fixes #277, fixes #238, fixes #278