Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keep bit-manipulation extension control option as localparam #55

Merged

Conversation

christian-herber-nxp
Copy link

Signed-off-by: Szymon Bieganski szymon.bieganski@oss.nxp.com

@@ -66,15 +66,15 @@ Other blocks use the ALU for the following tasks:

Bit-Manipulation Extension
Support for the `RISC-V Bit-Manipulation Extension version 1.0.0 <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/releases/download/1.0.0/bitmanip-1.0.0-38-g865e7a7.pdf>`_ and `draft version 0.93 from January 10, 2021 <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.93.pdf>`_ is optional. [#B_draft]_
It can be enabled via the enumerated parameter ``RV32B`` defined in :file:`rtl/cve2_pkg.sv`.
It can be enabled via the enumerated local parameter ``RV32B`` defined in :file:`rtl/cve2_pkg.sv`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should say that we as OpenHW Group do not maintain the RVB extensions, therefor users are responsible to fork the core and enable the parameter at their own risk in their fork, so that it is clear that these ISA extensions won't be at high TRL, nor maintained by OpenHW Group

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Signed-off-by: Szymon Bieganski <szymon.bieganski@oss.nxp.com>
@davideschiavone davideschiavone merged commit 2aa3bf8 into openhwgroup:main Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants