fix: fix openim scripts and ci add openim check

[cubxxw]

🔍 What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation
/kind feature

👀 What this PR does / why we need it:

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

The issue addressed by this PR is the lack of clarity in the current make check results, causing confusion and uncertainty about the underlying reasons. Additionally, the current CI system is not sufficiently robust.

🅰 Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #1638

📝 Special notes for your reviewer:

🎯 Describe how to verify it

CICD
local test

📑 Additional documentation e.g., RFC, notion, Google docs, usage docs, etc.:

[sweep-ai]

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

• Apply: All new business logic should have corresponding unit tests.
• Apply: Refactor large functions to be more modular.
• Apply: Add docstrings to all functions and file headers.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (cfde7bb) 5.13% compared to head (a014ce2) 5.13%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1632   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   5.13%   5.13%           
=====================================
  Files         42      42           
  Lines       3779    3779           
=====================================
  Hits         194     194           
  Misses      3574    3574           
  Partials      11      11           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.