Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8254876: (fs) NullPointerException not thrown when first argument to Path.of or Paths.get is null #1020

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

bplb
Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb commented Nov 2, 2020

Please review this simple fix to have Path.of(String,String) throw a NullPointerException if the first parameter is null.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x64 Linux x86 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ✔️ (5/5 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1) ⏳ (3/9 running) ⏳ (6/9 running) ⏳ (9/9 running) ⏳ (9/9 running)

Issue

  • JDK-8254876: (fs) NullPointerException not thrown when first argument to Path.of or Paths.get is null

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1020/head:pull/1020
$ git checkout pull/1020

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 2, 2020

👋 Welcome back bpb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 2, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2020

@bplb The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the nio nio-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 2, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 2, 2020

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2020

@bplb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8254876: (fs) NullPointerException not thrown when first argument to Path.of or Paths.get is null

Reviewed-by: rriggs, alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 38 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b46d73b: 8255239: The timezone of the hs_err_pid log file is corrupted in Japanese locale
  • 6606e09: 8255380: (zipfs) ZipFileSystem::readExtra can fail if zipinfo-time is not set to false
  • 88ee973: 8254827: JVMCI: Enable it for Windows+AArch64
  • f64a15d: 8254315: Shenandoah: Concurrent weak reference processing
  • 83f3cf4: 8196087: java/awt/image/DrawImage/IncorrectUnmanagedImageRotatedClip.java fails
  • 134e22a: 8255606: Enable concurrent stack processing on x86_32 platforms
  • ca216ba: 8255810: Zero: build fails without JVMTI
  • d47336b: 8248320: Provide a unique accessible name for
  • 64a9811: 8255798: Remove dead headless code in CompileJavaModules.gmk
  • 364b0fe: 8255801: Race when building ct.sym build tools
  • ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/05bcd67e6501f3824020edd1ab036c87888fa229...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 2, 2020
@bplb
Copy link
Member Author

bplb commented Nov 3, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 3, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 3, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2020

@bplb Since your change was applied there have been 38 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b46d73b: 8255239: The timezone of the hs_err_pid log file is corrupted in Japanese locale
  • 6606e09: 8255380: (zipfs) ZipFileSystem::readExtra can fail if zipinfo-time is not set to false
  • 88ee973: 8254827: JVMCI: Enable it for Windows+AArch64
  • f64a15d: 8254315: Shenandoah: Concurrent weak reference processing
  • 83f3cf4: 8196087: java/awt/image/DrawImage/IncorrectUnmanagedImageRotatedClip.java fails
  • 134e22a: 8255606: Enable concurrent stack processing on x86_32 platforms
  • ca216ba: 8255810: Zero: build fails without JVMTI
  • d47336b: 8248320: Provide a unique accessible name for
  • 64a9811: 8255798: Remove dead headless code in CompileJavaModules.gmk
  • 364b0fe: 8255801: Race when building ct.sym build tools
  • ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/05bcd67e6501f3824020edd1ab036c87888fa229...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 450452b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

openjdk-notifier bot referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2020
…Path.of or Paths.get is null

Reviewed-by: rriggs, alanb
@bplb bplb deleted the JDK-8254876-PathOf branch November 3, 2020 19:47
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

I've added release-note=yes to the JBS issue as I think this one will need a release note. There may be an argument to submit a CSR too as this is changing long standing behavior (to align the method with its specification).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants