Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8295414: [Aarch64] C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file #10749

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dean-long
Copy link
Member

@dean-long dean-long commented Oct 18, 2022

The "bad AD file" error is because PartialSubtypeCheck produces an iRegP_R5 result, which cannot be matched as an input where iRegP is expected.
Update the test to reproduce the crash and updated iRegP rule to match iRegP_R5.
The fact that this went so long without being noticed makes me wonder how much test coverage PartialSubtypeCheck has received on aarch64.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8295414: [Aarch64] C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10749/head:pull/10749
$ git checkout pull/10749

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10749
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10749/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10749

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10749

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10749.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 18, 2022

👋 Welcome back dlong! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 18, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2022

@dean-long The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 18, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 18, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2022

@dean-long This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8295414: [Aarch64] C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file

Reviewed-by: kvn, chagedorn, aph

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 34 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 545021b: 8294438: Fix misleading-indentation warnings in hotspot
  • c5e0464: 8291456: com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java failed with: Wrong number of class unload events: expected 10 got 4
  • 8d4c077: 8295302: Do not use ArrayList when LambdaForm has a single ClassData
  • 017e798: 8293939: Move continuation_enter_setup and friends
  • f872467: 8255746: Make PrintCompilation available on a per method level
  • 388a56e: 8294467: Fix sequence-point warnings in Hotspot
  • ceb5b08: 8294468: Fix char-subscripts warnings in Hotspot
  • 7b1c676: 8295662: jdk/incubator/vector tests fail "assert(VM_Version::supports_avx512vlbw()) failed"
  • 5eaf568: 8295668: validate-source failure after JDK-8290011
  • e238920: 8295372: CompactNumberFormat handling of number one with decimal part
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/0233ba763d84e6da8ec03df5d021a13c5fbbc871...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 18, 2022
Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, looks good!

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Christian and Vladimir.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

@theRealAph, do you agree with this fix?

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Andrew.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2022

Going to push as commit d3eba85.
Since your change was applied there have been 49 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 028e8b3: 8137022: Concurrent refinement thread adjustment and (de-)activation suboptimal
  • faa6b66: 8295715: Minimize disabled warnings in serviceability libs
  • de1e0c5: 8295719: Remove unneeded disabled warnings in jdk.sctp
  • 9612cf9: 8295529: Add link to JBS to README.md
  • b37421e: 8295564: Norwegian Nynorsk Locale is missing formatting
  • 6707bfb: 8029633: Raw inner class constructor ref should not perform diamond inference
  • 7bc9692: 8294670: Enhanced switch statements have an implicit default which does not complete normally
  • 95dd376: 8291914: generated constructors are considered compact when they shouldn't
  • 9b97162: 7039014: Confusing error message for method conflict
  • 78dc497: 8294550: Sealed check for casts isn't applied to array components
  • ... and 39 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/0233ba763d84e6da8ec03df5d021a13c5fbbc871...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 20, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 20, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 20, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2022

@dean-long Pushed as commit d3eba85.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants