Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8305712: [MacOS] Deprecated Cocoa-NSEvent names #13435

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor

@honkar-jdk honkar-jdk commented Apr 11, 2023

There are a few deprecated Cocoa NSEvent names currently in use in JDK.

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/jdk-21+17/src/java.desktop/macosx/classes/sun/lwawt/macosx/CocoaConstants.java
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appkit/nsmousemoved

Since these event names are marked for deprecation it is better to switch to the newer names.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13435/head:pull/13435
$ git checkout pull/13435

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13435
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13435/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13435

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13435

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13435.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 11, 2023

👋 Welcome back honkar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 11, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 11, 2023

@honkar-jdk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 11, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 11, 2023

Webrevs

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor

prrace commented Apr 11, 2023

This has been tested in the CI build system, right ? And all tests pass too, right ?

@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ - (void)windowDidExitFullScreen:(NSNotification *)notification {
}

- (void)sendEvent:(NSEvent *)event {
if ([event type] == NSLeftMouseDown || [event type] == NSRightMouseDown || [event type] == NSOtherMouseDown) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since you are touching this, maybe we can format it for better legibility !

if ([event type] == NSEventTypeLeftMouseDown ||
     [event type] == NSEventTypeRightMouseDown ||
     [event type] == NSEventTypeOtherMouseDown))
{

@@ -173,16 +173,16 @@ - (void)handleJavaMouseEvent:(NSEvent *)event
jint javaKind = 0;

switch (kind) {
case NSLeftMouseUp: case NSRightMouseUp: case NSOtherMouseUp:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ugh. I've never seen multiple case: clauses on one line.
break these up too.

@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor Author

This has been tested in the CI build system, right ? And all tests pass too, right ?

@prrace That is correct Phil, CI testing passes and additionally, I checked by running mouse related tests locally - java/awt/Mouse (since all the NSEvents correspond to mouse events) and they work the same in both cases - before and after the changes. Are there any other set of tests to be cross-checked again to ensure the changes don't break anything?

@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor Author

I missed updating the copyright year, will be updating with the rest of the changes in the next commit.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2022, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2022, JetBrains s.r.o.. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
Copy link
Contributor Author

@honkar-jdk honkar-jdk Apr 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if we need to have Oracle and JetBrains copyright here? The test was originally contributed by JetBrains team.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIRC we need both Oracle and JetBrains copyrights here.

You need to have two years in Oracle copyright: 1st - the year of the initial load; 2nd - the year of the last modification. In other words something like that:
Copyright (c) 2022, 2023,

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2022, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2022, JetBrains s.r.o.. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIRC we need both Oracle and JetBrains copyrights here.

You need to have two years in Oracle copyright: 1st - the year of the initial load; 2nd - the year of the last modification. In other words something like that:
Copyright (c) 2022, 2023,

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 12, 2023

@honkar-jdk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8305712: [MacOS] Deprecated Cocoa-NSEvent names

Reviewed-by: dmarkov, prr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 182 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3f36dd8: 8305529: DefaultProxySelector.select(URI) in certain cases returns a List with null element
  • 425ef06: 8303923: ZipOutStream::putEntry should include an apiNote to indicate that the STORED compression method should be used when writing directory entries
  • 2bbbff2: 8305858: Resolve multiple definition of 'handleSocketError' when statically linking with JDK native libraries
  • bc15163: 8304834: Fix wrapper insertion in TestScaffold.parseArgs(String args[])
  • 19380d7: 8305324: C2: Wrong execution of vectorizing Interger.reverseBytes
  • 87017b5: 8295859: Update Manual Test Groups
  • 99a9dbc: 8305783: x86_64: Optimize AbsI and AbsL
  • d8af7a6: 8304725: AsyncGetCallTrace can cause SIGBUS on M1
  • b9bdbe9: 8305524: AArch64: Fix arraycopy issue on SVE caused by matching rule vmask_gen_sub
  • 82e8b03: 8305203: Simplify trimming operation in Region::Ideal
  • ... and 172 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/50a995f03a0cc5c342929a0f48c43fd04fdf0b0d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 12, 2023
@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 13, 2023

Going to push as commit d7dc474.
Since your change was applied there have been 188 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e0620b8: 8296420: javac has long lines in its command-line help
  • 6b9b7d1: 8304350: Font.getStringBounds calculates wrong width for TextAttribute.TRACKING other than 0.0
  • 2060c8e: 8305688: jdk build --with-memory-size=1024 broken by JDK-8305100
  • 646b666: 8305900: Use loopback IP addresses in security policy files of httpclient tests
  • fb9a29d: 8305414: gtest/NMTGtests.java is failing various sub-tests
  • e846a1d: 8304450: [vectorapi] Refactor VectorShuffle implementation
  • 3f36dd8: 8305529: DefaultProxySelector.select(URI) in certain cases returns a List with null element
  • 425ef06: 8303923: ZipOutStream::putEntry should include an apiNote to indicate that the STORED compression method should be used when writing directory entries
  • 2bbbff2: 8305858: Resolve multiple definition of 'handleSocketError' when statically linking with JDK native libraries
  • bc15163: 8304834: Fix wrapper insertion in TestScaffold.parseArgs(String args[])
  • ... and 178 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/50a995f03a0cc5c342929a0f48c43fd04fdf0b0d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 13, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 13, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 13, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 13, 2023

@honkar-jdk Pushed as commit d7dc474.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants