-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JDK-8305712: [MacOS] Deprecated Cocoa-NSEvent names #13435
Conversation
👋 Welcome back honkar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@honkar-jdk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
This has been tested in the CI build system, right ? And all tests pass too, right ? |
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ - (void)windowDidExitFullScreen:(NSNotification *)notification { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
- (void)sendEvent:(NSEvent *)event { | |||
if ([event type] == NSLeftMouseDown || [event type] == NSRightMouseDown || [event type] == NSOtherMouseDown) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since you are touching this, maybe we can format it for better legibility !
if ([event type] == NSEventTypeLeftMouseDown ||
[event type] == NSEventTypeRightMouseDown ||
[event type] == NSEventTypeOtherMouseDown))
{
@@ -173,16 +173,16 @@ - (void)handleJavaMouseEvent:(NSEvent *)event | |||
jint javaKind = 0; | |||
|
|||
switch (kind) { | |||
case NSLeftMouseUp: case NSRightMouseUp: case NSOtherMouseUp: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ugh. I've never seen multiple case: clauses on one line.
break these up too.
@prrace That is correct Phil, CI testing passes and additionally, I checked by running mouse related tests locally - java/awt/Mouse (since all the NSEvents correspond to mouse events) and they work the same in both cases - before and after the changes. Are there any other set of tests to be cross-checked again to ensure the changes don't break anything? |
I missed updating the copyright year, will be updating with the rest of the changes in the next commit. |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
/* | |||
* Copyright (c) 2022, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | |||
* Copyright (c) 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | |||
* Copyright (c) 2022, JetBrains s.r.o.. All rights reserved. | |||
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if we need to have Oracle and JetBrains copyright here? The test was originally contributed by JetBrains team.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC we need both Oracle and JetBrains copyrights here.
You need to have two years in Oracle copyright: 1st - the year of the initial load; 2nd - the year of the last modification. In other words something like that:
Copyright (c) 2022, 2023,
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
/* | |||
* Copyright (c) 2022, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | |||
* Copyright (c) 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | |||
* Copyright (c) 2022, JetBrains s.r.o.. All rights reserved. | |||
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC we need both Oracle and JetBrains copyrights here.
You need to have two years in Oracle copyright: 1st - the year of the initial load; 2nd - the year of the last modification. In other words something like that:
Copyright (c) 2022, 2023,
@honkar-jdk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 182 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit d7dc474.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@honkar-jdk Pushed as commit d7dc474. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
There are a few deprecated Cocoa NSEvent names currently in use in JDK.
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/jdk-21+17/src/java.desktop/macosx/classes/sun/lwawt/macosx/CocoaConstants.java
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appkit/nsmousemoved
Since these event names are marked for deprecation it is better to switch to the newer names.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13435/head:pull/13435
$ git checkout pull/13435
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13435
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13435/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13435
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13435
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13435.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment