8264748: Do not include arguments.hpp from compilerDefinitions.hpp

[iklam]

compilerDefinitions.hpp is a popular header, included by 588 of about 1000 HotSpot .o files. It includes arguments.hpp only for a single function that's not used in critical paths.

After refactoring, the number of .o files that includes arguments.hpp reduces from 623 to 68.

(I also removed arguments.hpp from other files that don't actually need it.)

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8264748: Do not include arguments.hpp from compilerDefinitions.hpp

Reviewers

• Gerard Ziemski (@gerard-ziemski - Committer)
• Stefan Karlsson (@stefank - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3351/head:pull/3351
$ git checkout pull/3351

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3351
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3351/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3351

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3351

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3351.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@iklam The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[iklam]

/label remove serviceability

[openjdk]

@iklam
The serviceability label was successfully removed.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (e765a692)

[gerard-ziemski]

Nice!

How do you figure out where to remove the unneeded header and/or what to replace it with?

Do you use some tool to help you out with this?

[iklam]

Nice!

How do you figure out where to remove the unneeded header and/or what to replace it with?

Do you use some tool to help you out with this?

Hi Gerard, thanks for the review. The tools I used are here: https://github.com/iklam/tools/tree/main/headers

[openjdk]

@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8264748: Do not include arguments.hpp from compilerDefinitions.hpp

Reviewed-by: gziemski, stefank

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• a756d8d: 8264759: x86_32 Minimal VM build failure after JDK-8262355
• 0f13e22: 8264791: java/util/Random/RandomTestBsi1999.java failed "java.security.SecureRandom nextFloat consecutive"
• 4bb80f3: 8262898: com/sun/net/httpserver/bugs/8199849/ParamTest.java times out
• 2f51699: 8264554: X509KeyManagerImpl calls getProtectionParameter with incorrect alias
• 114e3c3: 8263856: Github Actions for macos/aarch64 cross-build
• a611c46: 8264048: Fix caching in Jar URL connections when an entry is missing
• bf26a25: 8264027: Refactor "CLEANUP" region printing
• eb6330e: 8264047: Duplicate global variable 'jvm' in libjavajpeg and libawt
• 8132548: 8264359: Compiler directives should enable DebugNonSafepoints when PrintAssembly is requested
• ec7b002: 8264626: C1 should be able to inline excluded methods

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[iklam]

Thanks @stefank and @gerard-ziemski for the review.
/integrate

[openjdk]

@iklam Since your change was applied there have been 13 commits pushed to the master branch:

• c3abdc9: 8264797: Do not include klassVtable.hpp from instanceKlass.hpp
• eb5c097: 8262389: Use permitted_enctypes if default_tkt_enctypes or default_tgs_enctypes is not present
• bfb034a: 8264524: jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails due to swapping not working
• a756d8d: 8264759: x86_32 Minimal VM build failure after JDK-8262355
• 0f13e22: 8264791: java/util/Random/RandomTestBsi1999.java failed "java.security.SecureRandom nextFloat consecutive"
• 4bb80f3: 8262898: com/sun/net/httpserver/bugs/8199849/ParamTest.java times out
• 2f51699: 8264554: X509KeyManagerImpl calls getProtectionParameter with incorrect alias
• 114e3c3: 8263856: Github Actions for macos/aarch64 cross-build
• a611c46: 8264048: Fix caching in Jar URL connections when an entry is missing
• bf26a25: 8264027: Refactor "CLEANUP" region printing
• ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/ff223530b66a83fb77c477da97a2dd60df448ec8...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 17202c8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.