8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases) #5270

dean-long · 2021-08-26T23:11:44Z

There is a subset of the general problem that we should be able to solve by looking at invokedynamic/invokehandle call sites and MethodHandle constant pool entries. If a replay references a hidden class that is discoverable in one of those locations, then we can use the location as a replacement for the transient VM name.

Examples of references to hidden class locations:

@bci compiler/ciReplay/CiReplayBase$TestMain test (I)V 1 <appendix> argL0 ;
@bci compiler/ciReplay/CiReplayBase$TestMain main ([Ljava/lang/String;)V 0 <appendix> form vmentry <vmtarget> ;
@cpi compiler/ciReplay/CiReplayBase$TestMain 56 form vmentry <vmtarget> ;

Progress

Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
Commit message must refer to an issue
Change must be properly reviewed

Issues

JDK-8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases)
JDK-8012267: ciReplay: fails to resolve @SignaturePolymorphic methods in replay data
JDK-8012268: ciReplay: process_ciInstanceKlass: JVM_CONSTANT_MethodHandle not supported

Reviewers

Vladimir Kozlov (@vnkozlov - Reviewer)
Vladimir Ivanov (@iwanowww - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5270/head:pull/5270
$ git checkout pull/5270

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5270
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5270/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5270

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5270

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5270.diff

bridgekeeper · 2021-08-26T23:11:58Z

👋 Welcome back dlong! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

dean-long · 2021-08-26T23:12:41Z

/id 8012267

openjdk · 2021-08-26T23:13:54Z

@dean-long Unknown command id - for a list of valid commands use /help.

dean-long · 2021-08-26T23:14:05Z

/help

openjdk · 2021-08-26T23:14:12Z

@dean-long Available commands:

cc - add or remove an additional classification label
clean - Mark the backport pull request as a clean backport
contributor - adds or removes additional contributors for a PR
covered - used when employer has signed the OCA
csr - require a compatibility and specification request (CSR) for this pull request
help - shows this text
integrate - performs integration of the changes in the PR
issue - edit the list of issues that this PR solves
label - add or remove an additional classification label
open - Set the pull request state to "open"
reviewer - manage additional reviewers for a PR
reviewers - set the number of additional required reviewers for this PR
signed - used after signing the OCA
solves - edit the list of issues that this PR solves
sponsor - performs integration of a PR that is authored by a non-committer
summary - updates the summary in the commit message
test - used to run tests

dean-long · 2021-08-26T23:14:46Z

/issue 8271911, 8012267

openjdk · 2021-08-26T23:15:18Z

@dean-long This issue is referenced in the PR title - it will now be updated.

Adding additional issue to issue list: 8012267: ciReplay: fails to resolve @SignaturePolymorphic methods in replay data.

openjdk · 2021-08-26T23:16:41Z

@dean-long The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

dean-long · 2021-08-26T23:22:15Z

/issue 8012268

openjdk · 2021-08-26T23:22:35Z

@dean-long
Adding additional issue to issue list: 8012268: ciReplay: process_ciInstanceKlass: JVM_CONSTANT_MethodHandle not supported.

mlbridge · 2021-08-27T00:42:42Z

Webrevs

01: Full - Incremental (77e06564)
00: Full (987f36f6)

vnkozlov

In general this looks good.
My only complain is lack of comments. It difficult to understand what happens in code.

src/hotspot/share/ci/ciEnv.cpp

dean-long · 2021-08-30T22:52:00Z

Thanks Vladimir for looking at this. Let me know if I missed some places that need comments.

vnkozlov

Looks good.

openjdk · 2021-08-31T14:55:36Z

@dean-long This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases)
8012267: ciReplay: fails to resolve @SignaturePolymorphic methods in replay data
8012268: ciReplay: process_ciInstanceKlass: JVM_CONSTANT_MethodHandle not supported

Reviewed-by: kvn, vlivanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 90 new commits pushed to the master branch:

8c37909: 8273234: extended 'for' with expression of type tvar causes the compiler to crash
28ba78e: 8244675: assert(IncrementalInline || (_late_inlines.length() == 0 && !has_mh_late_inlines()))
d05494f: 8266239: Some duplicated javac command-line options have repeated effect
93eec9a: 8272776: NullPointerException not reported
7b023a3: 8273257: jshell doesn't compile a sealed hierarchy with a sealed interface and a non-sealed leaf
f17ee0c: 8273263: Incorrect recovery attribution of record component type when j.l.Record is unavailable
fa9c865: 8273112: -Xloggc: should override -verbose:gc
dd87181: 8214761: Bug in parallel Kahan summation implementation
7fff22a: 8272805: Avoid looking up standard charsets
92b05fe: 8273251: Call check_possible_safepoint() from SafepointMechanism::process_if_requested()
... and 80 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/7212561dd1ec65d7f31792959f0eaaab6229eaf4...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

dean-long · 2021-08-31T22:22:29Z

Thanks Vladimir.

iwanowww

Very nice work, Dean!

iwanowww · 2021-09-01T13:04:27Z

src/hotspot/share/ci/ciEnv.cpp

+  _dyno_locs    = new (arena()) GrowableArray<const char *>(arena(), 100, 0, NULL);
+
+  // Iterate over the class hierarchy
+  for (ClassHierarchyIterator iter(vmClasses::Object_klass()); !iter.done(); iter.next()) {


Why do you iterate over the whole class hierarchy instead of inspecting only those classes which are present in CI?

Good question. It is because of the section in ciInstanceKlass::dump_replay_data that dumps subclasses. If one of the CI classes is java.lang.Object, we can get a lot of hidden classes dumped there from startup that are unrelated to the current compile. I wanted to see how many I could find as a proof of concept / stress test. My plan is to see if we can completely do without subclass dumping there by dumping better CHA information (JDK-8261192).

I still miss the connection between ciInstanceKlass::dump_replay_data() and ciEnv::find_dynamic_call_sites() cases.

ciEnv::find_dynamic_call_sites() dumps all invokedynamic and invokehandle (MH.invoke*()) call sites and MethodHandle CP Constants across the class hierarchy. Any particular benefit compared to just dumping that info on per ciInstanceKlass granularity?

Also, one more question: why do you dump MethodHandle CP constants and invokehandle call sites? Is it to record the connection between MethodHandle instances and hidden classes behind LambdaForms they are implemented with?

I still miss the connection between ciInstanceKlass::dump_replay_data() and ciEnv::find_dynamic_call_sites() cases.

ciEnv::find_dynamic_call_sites() dumps all invokedynamic and invokehandle (MH.invoke*()) call sites and MethodHandle CP Constants across the class hierarchy. Any particular benefit compared to just dumping that info on per ciInstanceKlass granularity?

Actually, find_dynamic_call_sites doesn't do the dumping, it just builds a map, so we only dump call sites that for hidden classes that are referenced in the replay data, preserving existing behavior. The dumping of subclasses in ciInstanceKlass::dump_replay_data confused me too, so I asked Tom Rodriguez about it. It's a substitute for CHA info in the reply file. If we load sublcasses of all the ciInstanceKlass's, then hopefully CHA queries will give the same answer at replay time. Note that not all subclasses have a ciInstanceKlass in the metadata. Subclasses of java.lang.Object include lots of hidden classes not referenced directly in the ci metadata.

Also, one more question: why do you dump MethodHandle CP constants and invokehandle call sites? Is it to record the connection between MethodHandle instances and hidden classes behind LambdaForms they are implemented with?

Yes, if I understand your question correctly. When inlining through an invokedynamic to the target, there's often an invokehandle at the end, and the hidden class isn't always found as the adapter or appendix. There are other locations like BSM arguments, but these are loaded from the constant pool and I found that looking at MethodHandle CP constants handled that case. Note again that I don't dump all MethodHandle CP constants, just the ones needed for a hidden class referenced in the reply data.

dean-long · 2021-09-01T21:46:23Z

@iwanowww Thanks for looking at this.

iwanowww

Thanks for the clarifications, Dean.

Looks good.

dean-long · 2021-09-03T23:21:56Z

/integrate

openjdk · 2021-09-03T23:23:17Z

Going to push as commit 14a3ac0.
Since your change was applied there have been 93 commits pushed to the master branch:

d414a88: 8273240: Dynamic test ArchiveConsistency.java should use CDSArchiveUtils
23fa0dc: 8272905: Consolidate discovered lists processing
ff4018b: 8268148: unchecked warnings handle ? and ? extends Object differently
8c37909: 8273234: extended 'for' with expression of type tvar causes the compiler to crash
28ba78e: 8244675: assert(IncrementalInline || (_late_inlines.length() == 0 && !has_mh_late_inlines()))
d05494f: 8266239: Some duplicated javac command-line options have repeated effect
93eec9a: 8272776: NullPointerException not reported
7b023a3: 8273257: jshell doesn't compile a sealed hierarchy with a sealed interface and a non-sealed leaf
f17ee0c: 8273263: Incorrect recovery attribution of record component type when j.l.Record is unavailable
fa9c865: 8273112: -Xloggc: should override -verbose:gc
... and 83 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/7212561dd1ec65d7f31792959f0eaaab6229eaf4...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

openjdk · 2021-09-03T23:23:28Z

@dean-long Pushed as commit 14a3ac0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

dean-long added 2 commits August 26, 2021 14:43

name hidden classes based on how they are reachable

6457535

fix printf warning

987f36f

openjdk bot changed the title ~~8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases)~~ 8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases) Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 26, 2021

dean-long marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2021 00:37

openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 27, 2021

vnkozlov reviewed Aug 30, 2021

View reviewed changes

src/hotspot/share/ci/ciEnv.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

rename LocPusher --> RecordLocation, add comments

77e0656

vnkozlov approved these changes Aug 31, 2021

View reviewed changes

openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 31, 2021

iwanowww reviewed Sep 1, 2021

View reviewed changes

iwanowww approved these changes Sep 3, 2021

View reviewed changes

openjdk bot closed this Sep 3, 2021

openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 3, 2021

dean-long deleted the 8271911 branch November 18, 2021 23:24

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases) #5270

8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases) #5270

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 26, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

mlbridge bot commented Aug 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

vnkozlov left a comment

dean-long commented Aug 30, 2021

vnkozlov left a comment

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading

dean-long commented Aug 31, 2021

iwanowww left a comment

iwanowww Sep 1, 2021

dean-long Sep 1, 2021 •

edited

Loading

iwanowww Sep 2, 2021

iwanowww Sep 2, 2021

dean-long Sep 2, 2021

dean-long Sep 2, 2021

dean-long commented Sep 1, 2021

iwanowww left a comment

dean-long commented Sep 3, 2021

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2021

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2021

8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases) #5270

8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases) #5270

Conversation

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021 • edited by openjdk bot Loading

Progress

Issues

Reviewers

Reviewing

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 26, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2021

mlbridge bot commented Aug 27, 2021 • edited Loading

Webrevs

vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dean-long commented Aug 30, 2021

vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2021 • edited Loading

dean-long commented Aug 31, 2021

iwanowww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

iwanowww Sep 1, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dean-long Sep 1, 2021 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

iwanowww Sep 2, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

iwanowww Sep 2, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dean-long Sep 2, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dean-long Sep 2, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dean-long commented Sep 1, 2021

iwanowww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dean-long commented Sep 3, 2021

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2021

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2021

dean-long commented Aug 26, 2021 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

mlbridge bot commented Aug 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading

dean-long Sep 1, 2021 •

edited

Loading