8244976: vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/Event/request/request001.java doesn' initialize eName

[lmesnik]

Fixed tests that use eName to print event name to print the class name. Plus some minor refactoring.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8244976: vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/Event/request/request001.java doesn' initialize eName

Reviewers

• Aleksey Shipilev (@shipilev - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to c6f79264
• Serguei Spitsyn (@sspitsyn - Reviewer)
• Chris Plummer (@plummercj - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9624/head:pull/9624
$ git checkout pull/9624

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9624
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9624/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9624

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9624

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9624.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back lmesnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@lmesnik The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (438229b2)
• 00: Full (c6f79264)

[shipilev]

Looks reasonable.

[openjdk]

@lmesnik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8244976: vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/Event/request/request001.java doesn' initialize eName

Reviewed-by: shade, sspitsyn, cjplummer

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 8159a1a: 8290706: Remove the support for inline contiguous allocations
• 7318b22: 8289551: Conversions between bit representations of half precision values and floats
• 2ae8e31: 8290669: Fix wording in sun.security.ec
• 8939095: 8289996: Fix array range check hoisting for some scaled loop iv
• da9cc5c: 8290806: Only add eager reclaim task to G1 post evacuate tasks if there were candidates
• 330adc0: 8290969: DumpClassListCLDClosure incorrectly uses ResizeableResourceHashtable
• 28bbdc5: 8290972: ProblemList java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java
• a6faf5d: 8290485: [vector] REVERSE_BYTES for byte type should not emit any instructions
• 0ca5cb1: 8290834: Improve potentially confusing documentation on collection of profiling information

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[sspitsyn]

I've added a couple of nits.
Otherwise, it looks good.
Thanks,
Serguei

[lmesnik]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 1451642.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 8159a1a: 8290706: Remove the support for inline contiguous allocations
• 7318b22: 8289551: Conversions between bit representations of half precision values and floats
• 2ae8e31: 8290669: Fix wording in sun.security.ec
• 8939095: 8289996: Fix array range check hoisting for some scaled loop iv
• da9cc5c: 8290806: Only add eager reclaim task to G1 post evacuate tasks if there were candidates
• 330adc0: 8290969: DumpClassListCLDClosure incorrectly uses ResizeableResourceHashtable
• 28bbdc5: 8290972: ProblemList java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java
• a6faf5d: 8290485: [vector] REVERSE_BYTES for byte type should not emit any instructions
• 0ca5cb1: 8290834: Improve potentially confusing documentation on collection of profiling information

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@lmesnik Pushed as commit 1451642.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.