Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8277529: SIGSEGV in C2 CompilerThread Node::rematerialize() compiling Packet::readUnsignedTrint #21

Closed

Conversation

TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr commented Dec 8, 2021

Backport of 8277529: SIGSEGV in C2 CompilerThread Node::rematerialize() compiling Packet::readUnsignedTrint
New implementation taken from 17u backport openjdk/jdk17u@aa11a93
That fits into 11u with one trivial manual integration of initialization _data_dependency_on(NULL).


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8277529: SIGSEGV in C2 CompilerThread Node::rematerialize() compiling Packet::readUnsignedTrint

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u pull/21/head:pull/21
$ git checkout pull/21

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u pull/21/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u/pull/21.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 8, 2021

👋 Welcome back mdoerr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 01cb2b9883d7c9ecdba0ee5bd42124faed4d080c 8277529: SIGSEGV in C2 CompilerThread Node::rematerialize() compiling Packet::readUnsignedTrint Dec 8, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 8, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 8, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2021

@TheRealMDoerr This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8277529: SIGSEGV in C2 CompilerThread Node::rematerialize() compiling Packet::readUnsignedTrint

Reviewed-by: goetz

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 9, 2021
@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review and the approval!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2021

Going to push as commit d665a4e.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 9, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 9, 2021
@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr deleted the 8277529_C2_loopPredicate branch December 9, 2021 13:50
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 9, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2021

@TheRealMDoerr Pushed as commit d665a4e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants