Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: kerasR: R Interface to the Keras Deep Learning Library #275

Closed
whedon opened this issue Jun 3, 2017 · 12 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: kerasR: R Interface to the Keras Deep Learning Library #275

whedon opened this issue Jun 3, 2017 · 12 comments
Assignees

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Jun 3, 2017

Submitting author: @statsmaths (Taylor Arnold)
Repository: https://github.com/statsmaths/kerasR
Version: 0.6.1
Editor: @karthik
Reviewer: @kaneplusplus

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @statsmaths. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@statsmaths if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jun 3, 2017

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @karthik it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jun 3, 2017

👋 @karthik - would you be willing to edit this submission?

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 3, 2017

@arfon sure

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 3, 2017

@statsmaths While I seek reviewers, are there any folks you are able to suggest?

@statsmaths
Copy link

Here are a few people who would be good reviewers but were not involved with the package itself: Mike Kane (@kaneplusplus), Akitaka Matsuo (@amatsuo), Adam Obeng (@adamobeng).

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 14, 2017

@statsmaths Thanks for those suggestions. Quick update that I'm trying to get this sorted out asap.

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 14, 2017

@whedon assign @kaneplusplus as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jun 14, 2017

OK, the reviewer is @kaneplusplus

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 14, 2017

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jun 14, 2017

OK, I've started the review over in #296. Feel free to close this issue now!

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 14, 2017

@kaneplusplus Thanks very much for agreeing to review this submission 🙏. I'm going to close this issue since we have now assigned you. Please continue your review at #296 and let me know if you have any questions or run into issues.

@arfon arfon closed this as completed Aug 12, 2017
@kaneplusplus
Copy link

@karthik Got it. Thanks for the update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants