[PRE REVIEW]: dsmmR: Estimation and Simulation of Drifting Semi-Markov Models #5107
Comments
editorialbot
added
pre-review
Track: 5 (DSAIS)
|
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type: |
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
arfon
added
the
waitlisted
|
@Mavrogiannis-Ioannis - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy. For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience! |
|
Thank you for your comment @arfon , I will wait. Should I suggest an editor for this paper from the list? |
|
@editorialbot commands |
|
Hello @Mavrogiannis-Ioannis, here are the things you can ask me to do: |
|
@editorialbot check repository |
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot generate my checklist |
|
Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue |
|
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
|
@editorialbot check references |
1 similar comment
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
|
@editorialbot check references |
1 similar comment
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
|
@editorialbot invite @Bisaloo as editor 👋 @Bisaloo would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS? |
|
Assigned! @Bisaloo is now the editor |
|
Hi @Mavrogiannis-Ioannis 👋, I'll be your topic editor for this submission. The first step in this pre-review is to find at least 2 reviewers. If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers, please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list). I'll already start looking in my own network in the meantime. |
|
Hi @dincerti 👋, would you be interested in reviewing this R package and the associated paper for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
Given your experience as an author and maintainer of the hesim R package, I believe you could bring us very valuable insights. You can have a look at our review criteria and review checklist to get an idea of what is expected. If you are not available to review this submission, do you have any recommendation for suitable reviewers? |
|
Hi @chjackson 👋, would you be interested in reviewing this R package and the associated paper for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
I found you via your work on the msm R package and I believe your expertise would be valuable here. You can have a look at our review criteria and review checklist to get an idea of what is expected. If you are not available to review this submission, do you have any recommendation for suitable reviewers? |
|
@Bisaloo Sorry to decline this, I'm very busy at the moment. Not sure that I know anyone with expertise particularly suited to this style of model, other than the authors of the packages cited in the paper. |
|
Hi @KZARCA @pierucci 👋 👋, would one of you be interested in reviewing this R package and the associated paper for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
As the main contributors to the heemod R package, I believe you are particularly well-placed to review this submission. You can have a look at our review criteria and review checklist to get an idea of what is expected. If you are not available to review this submission, do you have any recommendation for suitable reviewers? |
|
Hi @Bisaloo, I'm sorry, this package is not within my area of expertise. Best regards |
Hi, apologies for the delayed response. I am afraid I also do not have the time to review this package at the moment. |
|
Hi @m-clark 👋, would you be interested in reviewing this R package and the associated paper for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
Your very interesting 'Model Estimation by Example' book made me think of you for this submission. You can have a look at our review criteria and review checklist to get an idea of what is expected. If you are not available to review this submission, do you have any recommendation for suitable reviewers? |
|
Hi Hugo,
Thanks for reaching out and apologies for the belated reply, I was out on
vacation part of last week. Unfortunately, I'm not able to offer a review
at this time, as I am not able to do this sort of thing during my normal
work schedule, leaving little extra time for that sort of thing. I also am
not familiar with these models, so probably would not be a good judge of
content without spending time getting more context. In the end, I wish you
the best of luck and hope the package proves useful!
Michael
…On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:39 AM Hugo Gruson ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @m-clark <https://github.com/m-clark> 👋, would you be interested in
reviewing this R package <https://github.com/Mavrogiannis-Ioannis/dsmmR>
and the associated paper
<https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.05107/joss.05107/10.21105.joss.05107.pdf>
for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
dsmmR: Estimation and Simulation of Drifting Semi-Markov Models
Your very interesting 'Model Estimation by Example' book
<https://m-clark.github.io/models-by-example/> made me think of you for
this submission.
You can have a look at our review criteria
<https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html> and review
checklist <https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html>
to get an idea of what is expected.
If you are not available to review this submission, do you have any
recommendation for suitable reviewers?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5107 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABEAPOMTJB5LKEDTXPHCDWTW5AXVBANCNFSM6AAAAAAUIV2DLI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Hello everyone, Thank you for taking the time to comment about your availability and to search about potential reviewers. Kind regards, |
|
Hi @Mavrogiannis-Ioannis, do you have recommendations for reviewers out of your own network? I'm not sure who else could be suitable right now. I'll keep thinking on my end as well. |
|
Hi @Mavrogiannis-Ioannis 👋, I hope you doing well. In the absence of an answer to my question about reviewer suggestion by May 8th, even if it's to say that you cannot think of anyone, I'm going to have to reject this submission. |
|
Hello @Bisaloo, sorry for my absence. I hope you are doing well and that life has been kind to you. If we could reach some reviewers like @ellessenne, @Athene-ai, @dsurujon, which are the reviewers of the smmR package, it would be excellent. Ioannis |
|
I can review
…On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 at 22:30, Ioannis Mavrogiannis ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello @Bisaloo <https://github.com/Bisaloo>, sorry for my absence. I hope
you are doing well and that life has been kind to you.
If we could reach some reviewers like @ellessenne
<https://github.com/ellessenne>, @Athene-ai <https://github.com/Athene-ai>,
@dsurujon <https://github.com/dsurujon>, which are the reviewers of the
smmR package, it would be excellent.
Ioannis
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5107 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANGYEVGMHZ243QKYH5IFZA3XC3PH7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAUIV2DLI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Hi, I am afraid but I won't be able to review this submission this time. Alessandro |
|
Thanks for your quick answers @Mavrogiannis-Ioannis @Athene-ai @ellessenne! I'll try to reach dsurujon by email. |
|
@editorialbot add @Athene-ai as reviewer |
|
@Athene-ai added to the reviewers list! |
|
Hi, unfortunately I have to decline at this time. Best of luck all! |
|
Hello again @Bisaloo, we need one more reviewer for the process to start; is this correct? |
|
Hi @Mavrogiannis-Ioannis, yes, this is correct. I'm still struggling to find another appropriate & available reviewer. Would you have other suggestions please? |
|
@editorialbot add @RomainAzais as reviewer |
|
@RomainAzais added to the reviewers list! |
|
@RomainAzais has informed me that he contributed a chapter to a book edited by submission authors. While this is not completely defined in our conflict of interest policies, I have decided to officially waive it since this is akin to contribute to a special edition in a journal, and does not create a relationship that we deem likely to impact the quality and honesty of the review. Since we now have two reviewers for this submission, I will close this pre-review issue and create the actual review issue, where our conversations will take place from now on. |
|
@editorialbot start review |
|
OK, I've started the review over in #5572. |
Submitting author: @Mavrogiannis-Ioannis (Ioannis Mavrogiannis)
Repository: https://github.com/Mavrogiannis-Ioannis/dsmmR
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.1
Editor: @Bisaloo
Reviewers: @Athene-ai, @RomainAzais
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Mavrogiannis-Ioannis. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@Mavrogiannis-Ioannis if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: