[PRE REVIEW]: DistriFS: A Platform and User Agnostic Approach to Dataset Distribution

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @JIBSIL (Julian Boesch)
Repository: https://github.com/JIBSIL/DistriFS
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.0.1
Editor: @mahfuz05062
Reviewers: @aparoha, @suriya-ganesh
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/af09fee13984aa8fc8dc2c5cf062756e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/af09fee13984aa8fc8dc2c5cf062756e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/af09fee13984aa8fc8dc2c5cf062756e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/af09fee13984aa8fc8dc2c5cf062756e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JIBSIL. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@JIBSIL if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:

No paper file path

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (1843.7 files/s, 135681.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go                              28            449            120           1668
Markdown                         3             26              0             69
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            32            476            124           1755
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

     5	JIBSIL

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

⚠️ Failed to find a paper file in https://github.com/JIBSIL/DistriFS

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Paper file not found.

[danielskatz]

@xuanxu - I see PAPER.md in the repo. Do you know why editorialbot doesn't find it?

[danielskatz]

@JIBSIL - thanks for your submission. I notice that your paper doesn't seem to have any references, and is extremely short. Can you expand it a bit, including some related work perhaps? Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#how-should-my-paper-be-formatted and https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#example-paper-and-bibliography

[JIBSIL]

@danielskatz - I've added a Current Work section, bibliography and some references from the original paper. Apologies for the lack of references in the original - this is my first time converting a paper into a shorter form. Thanks for checking it out!

[JIBSIL]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Paper file not found.

[xuanxu]

editorilabot is case sensitive when looking for the paper source file, it must be named paper.md

[danielskatz]

Thanks @xuanxu!

[danielskatz]

@JIBSIL - please change the name of your paper to "paper.md" in lower case, and try to generate the PDF again

[JIBSIL]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[JIBSIL]

@danielskatz - Looks like it worked!

[danielskatz]

I don't see the references - Please look at the example paper again to see how this should work. I think you are missing the @s.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/HICSS.2008.436 is OK
- 10.1177/0165551513480107 is OK
- 10.1093/ijlit/ean010 is OK
- 10.1145/269005.266694 is OK
- 10.1145/3488716 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: IPFS - Content addressed, versioned, P2P file syst...
- 10.1109/msr.2017.59 may be a valid DOI for title: Bug characteristics in blockchain systems: A large...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[danielskatz]

@JIBSIL - also note that one of your references perhaps should have DOI added, as suggested above.

[JIBSIL]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[JIBSIL]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/HICSS.2008.436 is OK
- 10.1177/0165551513480107 is OK
- 10.1093/ijlit/ean010 is OK
- 10.1145/269005.266694 is OK
- 10.1145/3488716 is OK
- 10.1109/MSR.2017.59 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: IPFS - Content addressed, versioned, P2P file syst...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[JIBSIL]

@danielskatz - The issues with the references should have been fixed in the latest commit of paper.md

[danielskatz]

thanks @JIBSIL - I'll next look for an editor, who will then work on the review process

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @mahfuz05062 as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[danielskatz]

👋 @mahfuz05062 - do you think you can edit this submission?

[mahfuz05062]

I am not great at the subject matter, but I do have the bandwidth to edit it.

[danielskatz]

Thanks! I'll assign it to you, and while the reviewers really should be the subject matter experts, I can try to help if needed, perhaps in finding them, or in any other way.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot assign @mahfuz05062 as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mahfuz05062 is now the editor

[mahfuz05062]

Hi @JIBSIL , do you have any suggestions for potential reviewers? If so, please mention them here (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

[JIBSIL]

Hi @JIBSIL , do you have any suggestions for potential reviewers? If so, please mention them here (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Sure! Here would be my suggestions (from the list, but I don't know any of them personally):
aparoha
xiaoyang-sde
achanda
varshaprasad96
suriya-ganesh
imw
joao-lima

Just generally from looking for "distributed systems/networking" and Go from that list. Hope this helps!

[mahfuz05062]

Hi @aparoha @xiaoyang-sde @achanda @varshaprasad96 @suriya-ganesh are any of you interested in reviewing this paper and have bandwidth?

[aparoha]

I can review. Please send it over Abhay

…

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024, 18:13 Mahfuzur Rahman ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @aparoha <https://github.com/aparoha> @xiaoyang-sde <https://github.com/xiaoyang-sde> @achanda <https://github.com/achanda> @varshaprasad96 <https://github.com/varshaprasad96> @suriya-ganesh <https://github.com/suriya-ganesh> are any of you interested in reviewing this paper and have bandwidth? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6565 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGM6VVA3ONGNLEEK5V7UIO3Y5MERXAVCNFSM6AAAAABFRT6RQWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANJUGIYTKNRXGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[JIBSIL]

@aparoha - Sure! You can view it here (or on the repo here)

[aparoha]

How to submit my review comments? Thanks, Abhay

…

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024, 21:47 JIBSIL ***@***.***> wrote: @aparoha <https://github.com/aparoha> - Sure! You can view it here <https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.06565/joss.06565/10.21105.joss.06565.pdf> (or on the repo here <https://github.com/JIBSIL/DistriFS/blob/main/paper.md>) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6565 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGM6VVFP2I2PCNGSTPQCCJLY5M5T7AVCNFSM6AAAAABFRT6RQWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANJUGUYTSMZUHE> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[JIBSIL]

@aparoha - not sure how it works on the reviewer side; perhaps @mahfuz05062 could help?

[mahfuz05062]

Hi @aparoha , all the reviews in JOSS are done through GitHub (so a little different from the traditional peer-review process). I will open up a new review thread and explain the review process once at least two reviewers have agreed to perform the review. This is the guideline for reference: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.

[suriya-ganesh]

@mahfuz05062 if the review thread is open, I would love to review this as well.

[mahfuz05062]

@editorialbot add @aparoha as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@aparoha added to the reviewers list!

[mahfuz05062]

@editorialbot add @suriya-ganesh as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@suriya-ganesh added to the reviewers list!

[mahfuz05062]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6625.

[varshaprasad96]

@mahfuz05062 Sorry, missed the ping! Would be happy to review if some more eyes are helpful!