New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: NLSE: A Python package to solve the nonlinear Schrödinger equation #6607
Comments
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
Review checklist for @AbinashbuntyConflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
|
Review checklist for @obliviateandsurrenderConflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@editorialbot commands |
Hello @Abinashbunty, here are the things you can ask me to do:
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
@taladjidi I just noticed from the number of DOIs that there are only three references, and they are self-references. Is it correct that there is nothing else to cite from other authors? |
Hi @RMeli, sorry for the late reply I was in leave, I will update the manuscript to add a more faithful bibliography, as well as clarify the statement of need and what this package brings with respect to other projects. |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Hello @obliviateandsurrender and @Abinashbunty. How are you? How is the review coming along? Please let me know if you need any help or guidance. |
@RMeli I'm almost done with my review. Need to run some tests. By Friday I'll be done most likely. |
Hey @RMeli! I should be able to finish my review by next week. |
Thanks for the update! No pressure, I was just checking in to see if everything is going alright. |
Submitting author: @taladjidi (Tangui Aladjidi)
Repository: https://github.com/Quantum-Optics-LKB/NLSE
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 2.0.0
Editor: @RMeli
Reviewers: @Abinashbunty, @obliviateandsurrender
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@Abinashbunty & @obliviateandsurrender, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @RMeli know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @Abinashbunty
📝 Checklist for @obliviateandsurrender
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: