doc: initial cut at collaboration network proposal

[mhdawson]

First cut at collaboration network proposal

Changes needed to docs outside the proposal are in: #547

[mhdawson]

First cut at what the changes might look like.

I've marked do not land as the changes to the Charter, main README.md etc are outside of the proposal directory but I was not sure how else to show the complete picture. There are also still a few missing pieces but hopefully enough to give people a better view of the proposal.

[mcollina]

lgtm

[joesepi]

LGTM! Thanks @mhdawson

[designMoreWeb]

LGTM Great work @mhdawson

[kborchers]

LGTM!

[dmethvin]

LGTM after typo corrections. Also a stylistic question, should we capitalize the "s" in Collaboration Spaces if that is their proper name?

[dylans]

what's here so far looks good to me.

[mhdawson]

I've read through the CNCF SIG's and they are more along the lines of Working groups. General literature also seems to refer to SIG's a sub-groupings of members of an organization on a topic of interest.

What I had in mind with collaboration spaces was more around trying to provide spaces for people in the JS Ecosystem but not part of the Foundation (nor necessarily wanting to join or be part of the running of the CPC/foundation) to get together and collaborate.

A long way of saying have done a bit of reading, my preference would be to stick with the terminology outline in the PR.

[mhdawson]

@openjs-foundation/cpc I'd like to propose that this lands (minus the external governance changes) as stage 0 unless there are objections? I would then create a PR moving it to stage 1, and re-include the governance changes so that they are still visible/reviewable.

[mhdawson]

A number of approvals, no objections and I believe we agreed this could land as stage 0 in the CPC meeting this week.