New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Zeiss CZI: fix dimension calculations when expected planes are missing #1386
Conversation
Showinf results:
|
This prevents blank planes from containing garbage data.
One more commit pushed which should resolve the rubbish data in empty planes issue. For QA 10301, the Z counts are being set to 50 across the board because that seems to be what Zen does - it's true sparse data, so unfortunately just reducing the Z count doesn't accurately represent the acquisition. |
Tested using OMERO.CPP and TROUT:
Result pre-changes:
Results with changes to the CZI reader:
Conclusion: all looks good :). |
@melissalinkert is the master CZI file meant to be in the Companion files? |
This prevents pixel data from being accidentally included on the companion file list.
Commit pushed to address the companion file issue. |
@emilroz: did you request QA 10319 for that PR too? |
@jburel it wasn't me. There's a new mail to ome-users maybe related. But really, I don't know anything about this data. |
--rebased-to #1400 |
No more companion files. |
Zeiss CZI: fix dimension calculations when expected planes are missing
This should fix http://trac.openmicroscopy.org.uk/ome/ticket/12556. The dimensions for the files in QA 9521 and 10301 should now match the expected dimensions listed in the ticket and QA issues. I would not expect this to cause any test failures.
/cc @emilroz