Merge pull request #693 from openownership/docs_minor_edit

Minor edits to docs

docs/about/credits.rst

@@ -19,4 +19,4 @@ James Baster, Ben Webb, Amy Guy and David Raznick (`Open Data Services <https://
 
 The 0.3 version was written by Kadie Armstrong, Jack Lord, Simon Whitehouse and Emma Howard (`Open Data Services <https://www.opendataservices.coop>`_), with technical work from James Baster, Ben Webb, Amy Guy and David Raznick (`Open Data Services <https://www.opendataservices.coop>`_) and input from the data standard working group.
 
-The 0.4 version was writted by Kadie Armstrong, Emma Howard, Kathryn Irish and Rachel Vint (`Open Data Services <https://www.opendataservices.coop>`_), with technical work from Amy Guy and Ed Lloyd-Davies (`Open Data Services <https://www.opendataservices.coop>`_) and input from the data standard working group.
+The 0.4 version was written by Kadie Armstrong, Emma Howard, Kathryn Irish, Rachel Vint and Lewis Spurgin (`Open Data Services <https://www.opendataservices.coop>`_), with technical work from Amy Guy and Ed Lloyd-Davies (`Open Data Services <https://www.opendataservices.coop>`_) and input from the data standard working group.

docs/about/index.rst

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Partners and funders
 
    </h2>
 
-The initial development of BODS was funded by Open Ownership as part of a `UK Department for International Development (DfID) <https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-international-development>`__ funded project and its development continues to be funded by the `UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office <https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/foreign-commonwealth-development-office>`__ and the `Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) <https://www.norad.no/en/front/>`__
+The initial development of BODS was funded by Open Ownership as part of a `UK Department for International Development (DfID) <https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-international-development>`__ funded project and its development continues to be funded by the `UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office <https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/foreign-commonwealth-development-office>`__ and the `Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) <https://www.norad.no/en/front/>`__.
 
 `Open Ownership <https://www.openownership.org/en/>`__ is a non-profit organisation driving the global shift towards transparency and accountability in corporate ownership and control. It’s managed by an executive team who are overseen by a Steering Group made up of leading transparency and accountability organisations.
 

docs/primer/index.rst

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ The Beneficial Ownership Data Standard (BODS) provides a structured data format,
 
 Within BODS:
 
-* the :any:`data schema <schema-reference>` describes what data should be shared. It can also inform the design of data collection and management systems. A format called JSON can be used to publish BODS data
+* the :any:`data schema <schema-reference>` describes what data should be shared. It can also inform the design of data collection and management systems. A format called JSON can be used to publish BODS data.
 * the :any:`requirements sections <data-standard-index>` set out how information should be represented and managed to conform with the data standard. 
 
 Collecting, sharing and using beneficial ownership information as `structured data <https://www.openownership.org/en/publications/structured-and-interoperable-beneficial-ownership-data/benefits-of-structured-and-interoperable-data/>`_:

docs/standard/concepts.rst

@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ Representing beneficial ownership information in this way allows people to make
 Statements should therefore be considered immutable – presenting details about an element of beneficial ownership as claimed at a particular point in time. 
 
 To achieve this, each Statement produced by a data management system needs to include: 
+
 - the details claimed about the entity, person or relationship, as stored by records in the system
 - information about the source, date and context of the claim
 

docs/standard/modelling/dates-guidance.rst

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ The new statement:
 * has the same ``statementDate``, because the date of the original information submission has not changed
 * has a new ``publicationDate``
 * has a corrected ``interest.startDate``
-* has an Annotation explaining the correction
+* has an :ref:`Annotation <schema-annotation>` explaining the correction
 
 .. figure:: ../../_assets/dates-guidance3.svg
    :alt: 2 statements showing the same recordId and statementDate. The second statement has a different publication date, statementId and interest start date. The second statement has an annotation with motivation "correction" point towards the interest start date.