Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scrap Vehicle Excise Duty #267

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2015
Merged

Scrap Vehicle Excise Duty #267

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2015

Conversation

Floppy
Copy link
Member

@Floppy Floppy commented Jan 10, 2015

Put the tax on fuel instead, saving money on admin, and still having the desired effect of taxing emissions.

@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

👍

@otfrom
Copy link
Contributor

otfrom commented Jan 11, 2015

but doesn't put a tax on the emissions of creating the vehicle

@Floppy
Copy link
Member Author

Floppy commented Jan 11, 2015

I don't think VED does that now, and I'd prefer that embodied carbon cost (for everything) would be included in a proper carbon pricing regime. After all, under VED, a huge electric vehicle would still be zero-rated, as it's based on exhaust emissions.

@tmtmtmtm
Copy link
Contributor

I'd prefer the argument for this was backed up by something stronger than "it seems fairer". This is presumably something that there's already been quite a lot of research into, and that different countries will have deliberately chosen different approaches to. Is there a good summary of the issue somewhere?

@Floppy
Copy link
Member Author

Floppy commented Jan 14, 2015

Agree the "seems fairer" wording is vague. Is there a general principle of taxing the thing you're measuring directly as opposed to indirectly? What's that called? Direct/indirect is something else...

@Floppy
Copy link
Member Author

Floppy commented Jan 14, 2015

A summary of "road taxes" from around the world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_tax. Most seem to be based on emissions, but such a tax is nowhere near universal, and some, such as France's, have been abolished and replaced with more direct measures.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member Author

Floppy commented Jan 14, 2015

I suspect there is a different PR to be made on tax philosophy in general, but I'd prefer not to get into that here.

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor

👍

Floppy added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2015
@Floppy Floppy merged commit 60b7a11 into gh-pages Mar 6, 2015
@Floppy Floppy deleted the bin-ved branch March 6, 2015 01:44
@Floppy
Copy link
Member Author

Floppy commented Feb 8, 2017

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Agree 👍 :thumbsup: 1
Abstain :hand: -1
Block 👎 :thumbsdown: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

If the proposer makes a change to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants