Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/ Venue: read review and comment readers from right invitations #2065

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

celestemartinez
Copy link
Member

Sherry reported an issue when a paper is flagged for Ethics Review. It looks like the we were reading the review readers from the wrong place. I am now reading it from the review invitation itself instead of the ethics flag invitation.

@celestemartinez celestemartinez marked this pull request as draft April 1, 2024 17:10
@celestemartinez
Copy link
Member Author

There are new changes here:

I save the reviewer and AE checklist names in the ARR ethics flag invitation to process these invitations as well in the Ethics_Flag process function. I deleted the ARR specific process function since it's no longer needed.

cc @haroldrubio

invitations=self.venue.get_meta_invitation_id(),
signatures=[self.venue_id],
replacement=False,
invitation=openreview.api.Invitation(
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am reposting this invitation every time because I need to add some ARR specific values, but this invitation has no date process so nothing runs.

@celestemartinez celestemartinez marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 15:04
@melisabok melisabok merged commit 81ebf7c into master Apr 10, 2024
1 check passed
@melisabok melisabok deleted the fix/ethics-stage-multiple-review-forms branch April 10, 2024 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants