Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds .opendistro-job-scheduler-lock to list of protected indices #3237

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2023

Conversation

joshpalis
Copy link
Member

@joshpalis joshpalis commented Aug 24, 2023

Description

Companion PR (Need to merge first) : opensearch-project/job-scheduler#474

In addition to converting the .opendistro-job-scheduler-lock index to a system index, adding the index name to the security plugin's list of protected indices within the linux/windows installation scripts.

Issues Resolved

opensearch-project/job-scheduler#466
opensearch-project/job-scheduler#305

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing
  • New functionality has been documented
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Palis <jpalis@amazon.com>
@joshpalis joshpalis changed the title Adds .opendistro-job-scheduler-lock to list of protexted indices Adds .opendistro-job-scheduler-lock to list of protected indices Aug 24, 2023
@peternied peternied merged commit c46282b into opensearch-project:main Aug 25, 2023
57 checks passed
peternied pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2023
Backport of
- #3326
- #3237

Signed-off-by: Craig Perkins <cwperx@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: HenryL27 <hmlindeman@yahoo.com>
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2023
Backport of
- #3326
- #3237

Signed-off-by: Craig Perkins <cwperx@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: HenryL27 <hmlindeman@yahoo.com>
(cherry picked from commit f7991de)
stephen-crawford added a commit to stephen-crawford/security that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2023
Signed-off-by: Stephen Crawford <steecraw@amazon.com>
stephen-crawford added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2023
…(reverts #3237) (#3351)

### Description
- Resolves
opensearch-project/job-scheduler#492 , where
it was expected that the job schedule index is not protected.


### Check List
- [ ] ~New functionality includes testing~
- [ ] ~New functionality has been documented~
- [x] Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and
signing off your commits, please check
[here](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#developer-certificate-of-origin).

Signed-off-by: Stephen Crawford <steecraw@amazon.com>
DarshitChanpura pushed a commit to DarshitChanpura/security that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…(reverts opensearch-project#3237) (opensearch-project#3351)

### Description
- Resolves
opensearch-project/job-scheduler#492 , where
it was expected that the job schedule index is not protected.


### Check List
- [ ] ~New functionality includes testing~
- [ ] ~New functionality has been documented~
- [x] Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and
signing off your commits, please check
[here](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#developer-certificate-of-origin).

Signed-off-by: Stephen Crawford <steecraw@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants