Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STOR-829: Add CSIInlineVolumeAdmission feature gate #1316

Merged

Conversation

dobsonj
Copy link
Member

@dobsonj dobsonj commented Sep 29, 2022

This adds an OCP feature gate for a CSI Inline Volume Admission Plugin
behind TechPreviewNoUpgrade for 4.12.

Enhancement: openshift/enhancements#1240

/cc @openshift/storage

This adds an OCP feature gate for a CSI Inline Volume Admission Plugin
behind TechPreviewNoUpgrade for 4.12.
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2022

Hello @dobsonj! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

For merging purposes, this repository follows the no-Feature-Freeze process which means that in addition to the standard lgtm and approved labels this repository requires either:

bugzilla/valid-bug - applied if your PR references a valid bugzilla bug

OR

qe-approved, docs-approved, and px-approved - these labels can be applied by anyone in the openshift org via the /label <labelname> command.

Who should apply these qe/docs/px labels?

  • For a no-Feature-Freeze team who is merging a feature before code freeze, they need to get those labels applied to their api repo PR by the appropriate teams (i.e. qe, docs, px)
  • For a Feature Freeze (traditional) team who is merging a feature before FF, they can self-apply the labels (via /label commands), they are basically irrelevant for those teams
  • For a Feature Freeze team who is merging a feature after FF, the PR should be rejected barring an exception

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

jsafrane commented Oct 3, 2022

/lgtm
from storage POV

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 3, 2022
@dobsonj
Copy link
Member Author

dobsonj commented Oct 3, 2022

/assign @JoelSpeed

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

I don't have an issue with the code change here and I see @deads2k has approved the enhancement, but I do have a question about targeting this to 4.12. How many components need to be updated with the vendor after this and how much feature work is there still to merge? We have less than 4 days til the branch cuts and adding a new feature at this point seems like it's likely not to land in time

Is the code ready to go?

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

jsafrane commented Oct 4, 2022

I think branching day was postponed by 3 weeks.

How many components need to be updated with the vendor after this

IMO just kube-apiserver-operator, the feature is implemented as an admission plugin in the API server (like SCC).

how much feature work is there still to merge

A lot :-). It's a tough deadline, still, I think we can do it in the ~3-4 remaining weeks.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Feature complete target is 7th October 2022 according to the release dates spreadsheet, is this project following the no-ff procedures?

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

jsafrane commented Oct 4, 2022

Yes, we're no-ff.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Given no-ff this means you have just shy of 4 weeks, with that I think it's ok to merge this at this point
/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dobsonj, JoelSpeed, jsafrane

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 4, 2022
@dobsonj
Copy link
Member Author

dobsonj commented Oct 4, 2022

Since this is just adding a feature gate, there's nothing to document or test yet. Need this merged so I can check the feature gate from the admission plugin in the real PR.
/label px-approved
/label docs-approved
/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR labels Oct 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2022

@dobsonj: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ef2c62c into openshift:master Oct 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants