Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(PSAP-741) config/v1/types_cluster_version: add node-tuning capability #1373

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 6, 2023

Conversation

dagrayvid
Copy link
Contributor

@dagrayvid dagrayvid commented Dec 8, 2022

Along with adding a 4.13 capability set, this PR adds node-tuning to the set of OpenShift capabilities that can be optionally disabled at cluster install starting with OpenShift 4.13. This can be used to disable the Node Tuning Operator (NTO) and the containerized TuneD daemon which it manages.

The Node Tuning Operator applies TuneD default profiles to the control plane and worker nodes, and enables users to apply custom OS-level tuning. When disabled, the default tuning profiles will not be applied which may impact the performance of certain workloads, and will impact scalability of very large clusters (~900 nodes or ~1000 routes).

Any tuning that is functionally required will be handled by MCO going forward (see openshift/machine-config-operator#3440)

Related to PSAP-741. This must be merged before openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator#524

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2022

Hello @dagrayvid! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

For merging purposes, this repository follows the no-Feature-Freeze process which means that in addition to the standard lgtm and approved labels this repository requires either:

bugzilla/valid-bug - applied if your PR references a valid bugzilla bug

OR

qe-approved, docs-approved, and px-approved - these labels can be applied by anyone in the openshift org via the /label <labelname> command.

Who should apply these qe/docs/px labels?

  • For a no-Feature-Freeze team who is merging a feature before code freeze, they need to get those labels applied to their api repo PR by the appropriate teams (i.e. qe, docs, px)
  • For a Feature Freeze (traditional) team who is merging a feature before FF, they can self-apply the labels (via /label commands), they are basically irrelevant for those teams
  • For a Feature Freeze team who is merging a feature after FF, the PR should be rejected barring an exception

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @bparees
Also, should we add a ClusterVersionCapabilitySet4_13?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from bparees December 14, 2022 20:19
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Dec 14, 2022

Also, should we add a ClusterVersionCapabilitySet4_13?

yes

@dagrayvid dagrayvid force-pushed the optional-nto branch 2 times, most recently from 54dfeb0 to b7c476d Compare December 14, 2022 22:18
@dagrayvid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @bparees , I switched to the preferred capitalization of NodeTuning, and added a ClusterVersionCapabilitySet4_13

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Contributor Author

I split the PR into two commits, one for the 4.13 capability set, one for adding the NodeTuning capability.

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bparees I think this PR is ready for further review / merge

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Jan 3, 2023

looks right to me, but you'll need someone from @openshift/api-reviewers to sign off

@liqcui
Copy link

liqcui commented Jan 4, 2023

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Jan 4, 2023
@sheriff-rh
Copy link

/label docs-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR label Jan 5, 2023
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jan 5, 2023

This looks ok to me as long as the feature owner agrees and thinks it's plausible.

@jmencak You're the node tuning owner? Can I get your lgtm on this PR?

/approve
/hold

holding for @jmencak's lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jan 5, 2023
@jmencak
Copy link

jmencak commented Jan 5, 2023

Thank you David and David.
/hold cancel
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 5, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 5, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 5, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dagrayvid, deads2k, jmencak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @control-d
Can you please give the px-approved label needed for merge?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from control-d January 5, 2023 19:35
@control-d
Copy link

/label px-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR label Jan 6, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2023

@dagrayvid: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants