Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pass the node mac addresses to containers currently needing provisioningInterface #149

Merged

Conversation

asalkeld
Copy link
Contributor

@asalkeld asalkeld commented Jun 1, 2021

Since we don't know what node it will be started on, pass all master node macs in the env as PROVISIONING_MACS

/hold

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ spec:
- Disabled
type: string
provisioningNetworkCIDR:
description: ProvisioningNetworkCIDR is the network on which the baremetal nodes are provisioned. The provisioningIP and the IPs in the dhcpRange all come from within this network. IPv6 networks cannot be larger than a /64.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason this was removed? Maybe just a mistake during a merge conflict?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@asalkeld asalkeld Jun 4, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the version of controller-gen was bumped because of needing to import baremetal operator and this changed because of the controller-gen bump
858ecb6

@asalkeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

asalkeld commented Jun 7, 2021

/retest

@asalkeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

asalkeld commented Jun 8, 2021

/retest

@asalkeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@asalkeld asalkeld force-pushed the mac-not-interface-name branch 2 times, most recently from 33379f3 to ce3b187 Compare June 16, 2021 23:10
…ingInterface

Since we don't know what node it will be started on, pass all master node macs
in the env as  PROVISIONING_MACS=mac1,mac2,mac3
@asalkeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@kirankt kirankt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: asalkeld, kirankt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@asalkeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 22, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@asalkeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 69f46ac into openshift:master Jun 23, 2021
hardys pushed a commit to hardys/cluster-baremetal-operator that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2021
This was added for refresh-static-ips in openshift#149 - but actually
the point where we really need it is the initial setting of the IP
since the underlying script can't detect which interface to use
by IP until it's configured.
hardys pushed a commit to hardys/cluster-baremetal-operator that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2021
This was added for refresh-static-ips in openshift#149 - but actually
the point where we really need it is the initial setting of the IP
since the underlying script can't detect which interface to use
by IP until it's configured.
asalkeld pushed a commit to asalkeld/cluster-baremetal-operator that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2021
This was added for refresh-static-ips in openshift#149 - but actually
the point where we really need it is the initial setting of the IP
since the underlying script can't detect which interface to use
by IP until it's configured.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants