Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.9] Bug 2015306: bump api #224

Merged

Conversation

EmilyM1
Copy link

@EmilyM1 EmilyM1 commented Nov 16, 2021

This is to bump the api for backporting atomic-type-bug:
openshift/api#1036
For the changes made in bug 1992592 cluster-config needed an api bump that was done here for 4.10 which is this PR-
#219.
This PR is the corresponding bump for 4.9

  1. If the Bugzilla associated with the PR has the "FastFix" keyword, the subjective assessment on the issue has already been done and a customer is impacted. These PRs should be prioritized for merge.
    • verified
    • does not apply
  2. The bug has significant impact either through severity, reduction in supportability, or number of users affected.
    • verified
    • does not apply
  3. For branches that are in the Maintenance lifecycle phase:
    • The bug is a critical fix, no reasonable workaround exists, and a recommendation for upgrade has been ruled out, or
    • The bug is a security related bug
    • Branch not in maintenance mode yet (current release + previous release for 90 days after current GA; everything older is in maintenance)
  4. The severity field of the bug must be set to accurately reflect criticality.
    • verified
  5. The PR was created with the cherry-pick bot OR the PR’s description is well formed with user-focused release notes that state the bug number, impact, cause, and resolution. Where appropriate, it should also contain information about how a user can identify whether a particular cluster is affected.
    • verified

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 16, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and sttts November 16, 2021 01:26
@stlaz
Copy link
Member

stlaz commented Nov 16, 2021

/hold
the bump attempts to bring master@o/api to release 4.8

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 16, 2021
@EmilyM1
Copy link
Author

EmilyM1 commented Nov 16, 2021

closing while I get the status on 4.9

@EmilyM1 EmilyM1 closed this Nov 16, 2021
@EmilyM1 EmilyM1 reopened this Nov 16, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 16, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

go.mod Outdated
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ require (
github.com/davecgh/go-spew v1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33cc
github.com/ghodss/yaml v1.0.1-0.20190212211648-25d852aebe32 // indirect
github.com/go-bindata/go-bindata v3.1.2+incompatible
github.com/openshift/api v0.0.0-20210817132244-67c28690af52
github.com/openshift/api v0.0.0-20211014164657-4436dc8be01e
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if I am not mistaken, 4436dc8be01e is not the release-4.9 branch.

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Nov 23, 2021

Can you squash? The first commit looks wrong, but the later fixes it.

@EmilyM1
Copy link
Author

EmilyM1 commented Nov 23, 2021

/retest

1 similar comment
@EmilyM1
Copy link
Author

EmilyM1 commented Nov 24, 2021

/retest

@EmilyM1
Copy link
Author

EmilyM1 commented Nov 29, 2021

/test e2e-upgrade

k8s.io/code-generator v0.22.0-rc.0
k8s.io/api v0.22.1
k8s.io/apimachinery v0.22.1
k8s.io/code-generator v0.22.1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is the bump to 0.22.1 necessary?

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

@EmilyM1 please reference the underlying bug in the PR description and add a title.

@EmilyM1 EmilyM1 changed the title bump api bump api for 2015306 - list-type missing Dec 1, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

bump api for 2015306 - list-type missing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

bump api for 2015306 - list-type missing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@EmilyM1
Copy link
Author

EmilyM1 commented Dec 1, 2021

@sur check the new description and the #219 for why this is needed on the backport

@EmilyM1 EmilyM1 changed the title bump api for 2015306 - list-type missing bump api Dec 1, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@EmilyM1 EmilyM1 changed the title bump api [release-4.9] Bug 2015306 bump api Dec 2, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 2, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2015306 bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

k8s.io/api v0.22.0
k8s.io/apimachinery v0.22.0
k8s.io/api v0.22.1
k8s.io/apimachinery v0.22.1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we bump all of the kube libs to the same version?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I'll try v0.22.1

@EmilyM1
Copy link
Author

EmilyM1 commented Dec 8, 2021

/test e2e-upgrade

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

please squash into one commit, else lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 14, 2021

@EmilyM1: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 14, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2015306 bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 22, 2021
@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Dec 22, 2021
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 22, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: EmilyM1, s-urbaniak, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 22, 2021
@wangke19
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2021

@wangke19: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@wangke19
Copy link

/retitle [release-4.9] Bug: 2015306 bump api

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.9] Bug 2015306 bump api [release-4.9] Bug: 2015306 bump api Dec 22, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2021

@EmilyM1: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug: 2015306 bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@wangke19
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2021

@wangke19: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@wangke19
Copy link

/retitle [release-4.9] Bug 2015306: bump api

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.9] Bug: 2015306 bump api [release-4.9] Bug 2015306: bump api Dec 22, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 22, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2021

@EmilyM1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2015306, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1992592 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1992592 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ytripath@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2015306: bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 22, 2021
@wangke19
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2021

@wangke19: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2015306, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1992592 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1992592 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ytripath@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@wangke19
Copy link

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Dec 22, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 184a513 into openshift:release-4.9 Dec 22, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2021

@EmilyM1: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2015306 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2015306: bump api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants