New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-16164: retire LatencySensitive featureset #329
OCPBUGS-16164: retire LatencySensitive featureset #329
Conversation
@deads2k: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16164, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/jira refresh |
@deads2k: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16164, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/jira refresh |
@deads2k: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16164, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherrypick release-4.12 |
@deads2k: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.12 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Units appear to have failed on related tests but don't have logs captured, so not sure what the actual issue is |
9413138
to
8b490ca
Compare
@deads2k: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, mfojtik The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
0b27f0d
into
openshift:release-4.13
@deads2k: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16164: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16164 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@deads2k: new pull request created: #336 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
For multiple years this has been the equivalent of "". Make these consistent because in 4.13 the featureset handling added to the CVO didn't account for this and its unnecessary. It's more practical to migrate a few existing clusters than modify all producers.