Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OCPBUGS-19106: Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART #385

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2023
Merged

OCPBUGS-19106: Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART #385

merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot openshift-bot commented Nov 27, 2023 •
edited

Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure
that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds.

Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-cluster-config-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. labels Nov 27, 2023
@openshift-bot openshift-bot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. labels Nov 29, 2023
@openshift-bot openshift-bot changed the title Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART OCPBUGS-19106: Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART Nov 29, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19106, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Retaining the jira/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure
that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds.

Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-cluster-config-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm
/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 29, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5e2af49 and 2 for PR HEAD a360bc6 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c09668f and 1 for PR HEAD a360bc6 in total

@openshift-bot openshift-bot force-pushed the art-consistency-openshift-4.15-ose-cluster-config-operator branch from a360bc6 to f6dc668 Compare November 29, 2023 15:45
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19106, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Retaining the jira/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure
that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds.

Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-cluster-config-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 29, 2023
@CrystalChun CrystalChun mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2023
Merged
@wking wking mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2023
Merged
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit to openshift/release that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2023
@wking
ci-operator/config/openshift/cluster-config-operator: Base and builde…
8407833 
…r images from repo (#46335)

From [1]:

  Do not manually override the replacement rules of the builder and
  base images in CI configuration and let automation do its job.

This will allow ART to manage these images via automation like [2],
without needing associated tweaks in the release repository.  For a
similar recent example, see 9b1c5d8 (openshift/router: Use base
images from repo, 2023-11-21, #45914).

[1]: https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/images/#best-practice
[2]: openshift/cluster-config-operator#385
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Some changes to image config just merged, E2Es should be fixed now

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2023

@openshift-bot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2023
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed, openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit e6b1a8d into openshift:master Dec 4, 2023
10 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19106 is in an unrecognized state (ON_QA) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure
that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds.

Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-cluster-config-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-operator-container-v4.15.0-202312041611.p0.ge6b1a8d.assembly.stream for distgit ose-cluster-config-operator.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.15.0-0.nightly-2023-12-04-223539

@wking wking mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed Awaiting requested review from JoelSpeed

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

Assignees

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed

@xingxingxia xingxingxia

@wangke19 wangke19

@gangwgr gangwgr

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@openshift-bot @openshift-ci-robot @JoelSpeed @openshift-merge-robot @xingxingxia @wangke19 @gangwgr