New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "OCPBUGS-19106: Updating ose-cluster-config-operator-container image to be consistent with ART" #388
Conversation
… image to be consistent with ART"
@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19106, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.15-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn |
@wking: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/6c793360-93da-11ee-880c-32a0717f039d-0 |
The previous payload attempt hasn't launched a run as far as I can tell. Trying again: /payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.15-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn |
@wking: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/2785c6a0-93e0-11ee-8ddc-1689964b569c-0 |
Still didn't seem to work, let's try again |
@JoelSpeed: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a1e350f0-9414-11ee-89ff-2a13910a9c34-0 |
/lgtm Based on https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C068LS7RS6S/p1701834669669239 I don't think we need to run the HyperShift tests, not sure why the payload job isn't triggering correctly |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed, wking The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/override ci/prow/e2e-upgrade Failures appear to be unrelated |
@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-upgrade In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@wking: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/jira refresh |
@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19106, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@wking: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19106: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:
Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19106 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-operator-container-v4.16.0-202312061430.p0.gc436b7a.assembly.stream for distgit ose-cluster-config-operator. |
Reverts #385
It's complicated, but while ART is building RHEL 9 HyperShift and cluster-config-operator images, both ART and CI are building mostly-RHEL-8 machine-config operator images. HyperShift invokes both some
machine-config-*
and thecluster-config-operator
binaries. And the MCO binaries are currently RHEL 8 both in CI and in ART builds. Moving the CI cluster-config operator back to RHEL 8 might give us some breathing room vs. current 4.15 release-controller blocker failures like:Because of NodePool failures like: