stub everything #1
Conversation
| version: ee1a9a0726d2ae45f54118cac878c990d4016ded | ||
| - name: github.com/coreos/etcd | ||
| version: 420a452267a7ce45b3fcbed04d54030d69964fc1 | ||
| subpackages: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so this is etcd 3.2.24 openshift 4.0 is using 3.3.x. (3.3.10) Now k8s 1.11 brought in the v3.3.x etcd client I am just wondering if we should bump this as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
well no that didn't make it until 1.13 kubernetes/kubernetes#69322 nmd.
|
I'm going to merge this so that we can start the CI process. Feel free to continue making comments and we can take time tomorrow to explain what it does |
| ports: | ||
| - name: https | ||
| port: 443 | ||
| targetPort: 10257 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2379, I guess we need a peer in here is well 2380
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is the targetPort meaningful
There was a problem hiding this comment.
for etcd I would not map the port, but just use the normal 2379 and 2380 one-to-one.
| scheme: HTTPS | ||
| port: 10257 | ||
| path: healthz | ||
| initialDelaySeconds: 45 |
| from: | ||
| kind: DockerImage | ||
| name: docker.io/openshift/origin-cluster-etcd-operator:v4.0 | ||
| - name: hyperkube |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
how do we get this namespace in docker.io?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tnozicka can get you into the image building pipeline. He is probably already on it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FTR we are working on this. openshift/release#2758
This produces a command and some rough resources that probably won't work, but gets the repo started.
/assign @hexfusion