Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1814479: bindata/etcd: run etcdctl inside of container #268

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2020

Conversation

hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

@hexfusion hexfusion commented Mar 17, 2020

This PR adds a new bash function exec_etcdctl. this allows for etcdctl commands to be run within the actual container on the host.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2020
@alaypatel07
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2020
@alaypatel07
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

lets do this right and just use the etcdctl container

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 18, 2020
@retroflexer
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 18, 2020
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 18, 2020
@retroflexer
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alaypatel07, hexfusion, retroflexer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alaypatel07,hexfusion]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hexfusion hexfusion changed the title bindata/etcd: ensure member remove uses proper certs path Bug 1814479: bindata/etcd: run etcdctl inside of container Mar 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1814479, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1814479: bindata/etcd: run etcdctl inside of container

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 18, 2020
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 18, 2020
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1814479, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 18, 2020
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/skip

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@hexfusion: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/skip

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws

2 similar comments
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 18, 2020

@hexfusion: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure b0f0d08 link /test e2e-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 531a3df into openshift:master Mar 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1814479 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1814479: bindata/etcd: run etcdctl inside of container

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@hexfusion: new pull request created: #271

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

# execute etcdctl command inside of running etcdctl container
function exec_etcdctl {
local command="$@"
local container_id=$(sudo crictl ps --label io.kubernetes.container.name=etcdctl -o json | jq -r '.containers[0].id') || true
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sudo here is redundant. We check earlier that the script should be run with EUID as root.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants