Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove pod disruption budgets #323

Merged

Conversation

Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

@Miciah Miciah commented Nov 6, 2019

Pod disruption budgets cause problems for people who want to run small clusters or drain all workers at once, and PDBs are not obviously solving any problems, so do not create PDBs, and delete any PDBs that previous versions of the operator have created.

  • pkg/operator/controller/ingress/poddisruptionbudget.go (desiredRouterPodDisruptionBudget): Always return false.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 6, 2019
@Miciah Miciah force-pushed the remove-pod-disruption-budgets branch from e62ce37 to a72cb42 Compare November 6, 2019 00:53
Pod disruption budgets cause problems for people who want to run small
clusters or drain all workers at once, and PDBs are not obviously solving
any problems, so do not create PDBs, and delete any PDBs that previous
versions of the operator have created.

* pkg/operator/controller/ingress/poddisruptionbudget.go
(desiredRouterPodDisruptionBudget): Always return false.
* test/e2e/operator_test.go (TestPodDisruptionBudgetExists): Rename...
(TestPodDisruptionBudgetDoesNotExist): ...to this.  Verify that the pod
disruption budget does *not* exist.
@Miciah Miciah force-pushed the remove-pod-disruption-budgets branch from a72cb42 to f48a2f9 Compare November 6, 2019 01:58
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 6, 2019
@frobware
Copy link
Contributor

frobware commented Nov 6, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 6, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: frobware, Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1c6869c into openshift:master Nov 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants