Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1805224: Add support for AWS China region route53 Service #361

Merged

Conversation

wanghaoran1988
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 17, 2020
pkg/dns/aws/dns.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/dns/aws/dns.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 26, 2020
pkg/dns/aws/dns.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/dns/aws/dns.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/dns/aws/dns.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/dns/aws/dns.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@wanghaoran1988 wanghaoran1988 force-pushed the route53_china branch 2 times, most recently from 2f8c2a8 to f0dcb26 Compare February 27, 2020 03:27
@wanghaoran1988
Copy link
Member Author

@iranzo @abhinavdahiya Comments addressed, could you take another look?

@wanghaoran1988
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

pkg/dns/aws/dns.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

@iranzo @abhinavdahiya Comments addressed, could you take another look?

there is a inconsistency in how we are generating aws config.

// places that directly create or set aws.Config struct
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/361/files#diff-e30b09d9b7476806ee0e9a9de47a7d75R108
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/361/files#diff-e30b09d9b7476806ee0e9a9de47a7d75R118-R119

// places that use functions to create or update aws.Config
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/361/files#diff-e30b09d9b7476806ee0e9a9de47a7d75R109
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/361/files#diff-e30b09d9b7476806ee0e9a9de47a7d75R117

it just seems odd, any reason why it's that and why we cannot just use one way?

@wanghaoran1988
Copy link
Member Author

@iranzo @abhinavdahiya Comments addressed, could you take another look?

there is a inconsistency in how we are generating aws config.

// places that directly create or set aws.Config struct
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/361/files#diff-e30b09d9b7476806ee0e9a9de47a7d75R108
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/361/files#diff-e30b09d9b7476806ee0e9a9de47a7d75R118-R119

// places that use functions to create or update aws.Config
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/361/files#diff-e30b09d9b7476806ee0e9a9de47a7d75R109
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/361/files#diff-e30b09d9b7476806ee0e9a9de47a7d75R117

it just seems odd, any reason why it's that and why we cannot just use one way?

All updated to use functions

@wanghaoran1988
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@wanghaoran1988
Copy link
Member Author

/retest
@abhinavdahiya Could you take another look?

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you all for working through this.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit cb60146 into openshift:master Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ironcladlou, wanghaoran1988

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ironcladlou ironcladlou changed the title Add support for AWS China region route53 Service Bug 1805224: Add support for AWS China region route53 Service Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wanghaoran1988: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1805224 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1805224: Add support for AWS China region route53 Service

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ironcladlou: new pull request created: #367

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants