Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1905324: Request appropriate memory for ingress-operator container #515

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 6, 2021

Conversation

rfredette
Copy link
Contributor

Cluster components are expected to request cpu & memory resources. ingress-operator already requested an amount of cpu time, but didn't include a memory request.

Following the guidelines here, I ran make test-e2e against a cluster on AWS running a 4.7 nightly build. I queried prometheus for the metric container_memory_usage_bytes{container="ingress-operator"} every 15 seconds between the start and finish of the e2e run, then I sorted the data points by memory usage to find the 90th percentile, which in my run was 53,706,752 bytes, or about 51.2MiB.

Adding 10% overhead to that number produced 56.34MiB, which I rounded to 56MiB

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rfredette: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1905324, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1905324: Request appropriate memory for ingress-operator container

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sgreene570
Copy link
Contributor

56 MiB sounds good to me (unless anyone can think of a reason we would want to round that to the nearest multiple of 5 or 10).

@lihongan
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-operator

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rfredette: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator 3631991 link /test e2e-aws-operator

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Dec 31, 2020

TestNetworkLoadBalancer failed, but it should pass now that #518 has merged.
/test e2e-aws-operator

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Jan 1, 2021

Must-gather failed.
/test e2e-aws-operator

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Jan 5, 2021

/lgtm
Must-gather failed again.
/test e2e-aws-operator

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Miciah, rfredette

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jan 5, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9f2b030 into openshift:master Jan 6, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rfredette: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1905324 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1905324: Request appropriate memory for ingress-operator container

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants