Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug 1797657: increase the max-requests limits #733

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 3, 2020

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented Jan 27, 2020

more in line with real values.

/assign @smarterclayton

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 27, 2020
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Jan 28, 2020

@deads2k What are real values? Why these?

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 28, 2020

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 28, 2020
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

The limits were chosen during 3.x pre etcd2 where we had demonstrated hard boundaries on CPU use. Based on all data I have in etcd3 period, a 3x increase is not an issue and any bug we hit where load is not effectively transferred would be a bug in the platform, not due to this.

/approve

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Basically 1k was chosen arbitrarily based on a CPU usage number in the early 3.x time period. We have reclaimed somewhere between 5x and 10x CPU with etcd3, protobuf, improvements to internal efficiency, so a 3x bump gives us headroom without significantly increasing the risk of a failure due to excessive queries (we are likely to better respond with backpressure at multiple levels)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 29, 2020
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jan 31, 2020

/retest

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Feb 3, 2020

/lgtm

This will help for reasonably sized cluster. It might still not be enough for very dense clusters.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, smarterclayton, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deads2k deads2k changed the title increase the max-requests limits bug 1797657: increase the max-requests limits Feb 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1797657, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

bug 1797657: increase the max-requests limits

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 3, 2020
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Feb 3, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d87ca2b into openshift:master Feb 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1797657 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

bug 1797657: increase the max-requests limits

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants