Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1820687: allow patch for updating namespace #394

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 24, 2020

Conversation

soltysh
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh commented Apr 11, 2020

/assign @deads2k

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1820687, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1820687: allow patch for updating namespace

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 11, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2020
@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 11, 2020

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 14, 2020

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 14, 2020

/retest

2 similar comments
@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 14, 2020

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 14, 2020

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 14, 2020

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 14, 2020
@soltysh soltysh force-pushed the bug1820687 branch 2 times, most recently from b4ef4f6 to d412fb6 Compare April 15, 2020 11:24
@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 15, 2020

/retest

@@ -27,17 +27,20 @@ func TestSATokenSignerControllerSyncCerts(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()

// wait for the operator readiness
t.Logf("Waiting for true, false, false")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

t.Log, until 1.14, is not logging until the test finishes but if it panics we don't have logs - I'd do klog.Infof for now (don't forget klog.Init

terminationMessagePolicy: FallbackToLogsOnError
image: ${IMAGE}
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
command: ['/usr/bin/timeout', '30', "/bin/bash", "-c"]
command: ['/usr/bin/timeout', '105', '/bin/bash', '-ec'] # a bit more than 60s for graceful termination + 35s for minimum-termination-duration, 5s extra cri-o's graceful termination period
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

graceful termination applies to apiserver, I think we should set 60 s for TIME_WAIT + 5 s for crio

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 21, 2020

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 22, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 22, 2020
@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: soltysh, tnozicka

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a7887c3 into openshift:master Apr 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator#394. The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

In response to this:

Bug 1820687: allow patch for updating namespace

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh soltysh deleted the bug1820687 branch April 27, 2020 10:56
@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Apr 29, 2020

/cherrypick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@soltysh: #394 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.4":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
A	bindata/v4.1.0/kube-controller-manager/namespace-security-allocation-controller-clusterrole.yaml
M	pkg/operator/v411_00_assets/bindata.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/operator/v411_00_assets/bindata.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/operator/v411_00_assets/bindata.go
CONFLICT (modify/delete): bindata/v4.1.0/kube-controller-manager/namespace-security-allocation-controller-clusterrole.yaml deleted in HEAD and modified in Bug 1820687: allow patch for updating namespace. Version Bug 1820687: allow patch for updating namespace of bindata/v4.1.0/kube-controller-manager/namespace-security-allocation-controller-clusterrole.yaml left in tree.
Patch failed at 0001 Bug 1820687: allow patch for updating namespace

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants