Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1982778: jsonnet: thanosquery: Use HTTP probes as opposed to exec #1289

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 8, 2021

Conversation

philipgough
Copy link
Contributor

This is cherry pick of #1277 which backports to 4.8.z

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

The exec probe is timing out intermittently. This coud be caused in part
by the timing on the probe not being sufficient, or there may be an underlying
issue with the (exec, cri-o) combo.

This change takes the config for httpGet probes from upstream thanos and proxies
to thanos via the oauth-gateway where we bypass the health check endpoints.

The HTTP probe cannot directly ping thanos since it listens on localhost
and is unreachable from kubelet. This is by design.
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 19, 2021

@philipgough: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

jsonnet: thanosquery: Use HTTP probes as opposed to exec

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@philipgough philipgough changed the title jsonnet: thanosquery: Use HTTP probes as opposed to exec Bug 1982778: jsonnet: thanosquery: Use HTTP probes as opposed to exec Jul 19, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 19, 2021

@philipgough: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982778, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.8.0" release, but it targets "4.8.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1982778: jsonnet: thanosquery: Use HTTP probes as opposed to exec

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 19, 2021
@philipgough
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold for 4.8.z release

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 19, 2021
@philipgough
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@philipgough
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-agnostic-operator

Copy link
Contributor

@simonpasquier simonpasquier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 20, 2021
@prashbnair
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 21, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: PhilipGough, prashbnair, simonpasquier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2021

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982778, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1980888 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1980888 targets the "4.9.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @juzhao

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 23, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from juzhao July 23, 2021 10:23
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 23, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@ecordell
Copy link

ecordell commented Aug 4, 2021

[patch-manager] ⌛ This pull request was not picked by the patch manager for the current z-stream window and have to wait for the next window.

skipped

  • Score: 0.20
  • Reason: missed cutoff today, may make it tomorrow

NOTE: This message was automatically generated, if you have questions please ask on #forum-release

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@paulfantom
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@ecordell
Copy link

ecordell commented Aug 5, 2021

[patch-manager] ⌛ This pull request was not picked by the patch manager for the current z-stream window and have to wait for the next window.

skipped

  • Score: 0.20
  • Reason: missed cutoff today, may make it tomorrow

NOTE: This message was automatically generated, if you have questions please ask on #forum-release

@ecordell ecordell added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Aug 5, 2021
@ecordell
Copy link

ecordell commented Aug 5, 2021

[patch-manager] 🚀 Approved for z-stream by score: 0.20

picked

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@ecordell
Copy link

ecordell commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 8, 2021

@philipgough: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node 7b50ff1 link /test e2e-aws-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit e3f9fd7 into openshift:release-4.8 Aug 8, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 8, 2021

@philipgough: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1982778 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1982778: jsonnet: thanosquery: Use HTTP probes as opposed to exec

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@philipgough philipgough deleted the bz-1982778 branch August 9, 2021 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants